在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
85% -
了解详情
![]()
73% -
了解详情
![]()
65% -
了解详情
![]()
43%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排乘客
驾驶员
车碰
柱碰
后排座椅
前排座椅
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装
严重安全问题| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In the frontal impact, both the 6 and the 10 year dummies were properly restrained and forward movement was not excessive. However, dummy readings revealed high values of neck tensile forces in the 10 year dummy and marginal protection of the neck and chest of the six year dummy. In the side impact, there was insufficient pressure in the side curtain airbag to prevent the head of the 10 year dummy striking the interior of the car, around the C-pillar. This contact led to very high decelerations and protection was rated as poor. Dummy readings of chest deceleration also indicated poor protection of that part of the body. The side wing of the child restraint used for the six year dummy was found to be broken after the test. High-speed film revealed that the dummy's head was not properly contained during the impact, increasing the likelihood of head contact with parts of the car interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restrain to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 17.5 分
骨盆碰撞 4.1 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and the bonnet gave predominantly good or adequate results, with poor protection only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided to the pelvis region was mixed, with areas of good and poor protection. An autonomous braking system capable of detecting pedestrians is not available on the Baleno.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
| 系统名称 | Radar Brake Support | |||
| 类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| 运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
| 其他信息 | Default On | |||
| 性能 | | ||||
| 仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
| 运行速度 | 5-210 公里/小时 | 5-210 公里/小时 | ||
| 接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 30 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 40 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
| 接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 65 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 70 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
| 近距离跟车 | ||||
| 前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
| 前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
| 远距离跟车 | ||||
| 前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
| 前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
The Baleno has a seatbelt reminder system as standard for all seating positions. The optional autonomous braking system demonstrated good performance in Euro NCAP's tests. A speed assistance system is also an option but is not included in the 'Radar Brake Support' option pack so was not included in this assessment. A lane assistance system is not available for the Baleno.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Suzuki Baleno
安全套装名称 Radar Brake Support
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2016
整备质量 890kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Balenos
级别 微型车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The Suzuki Baleno has two star ratings: one based on the safety equipment which is fitted as standard to all cars in the range and another which also includes an optional safety pack called 'Radar Brake Support'. This assessment includes the option pack. Car-buyers should make sure they order the option pack if they want to have the safety shown in this assessment.
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Suzuki showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of the driver was rated as good except for the chest, protection of which was adequate. Dummy readings of chest compression indicated marginal protection for this part of the body but good or adequate protection elsewhere. In the side barrier test, dummy numbers showed good protection but the score for the head was penalised as the side curtain airbag was deemed not to have deployed in the correct manner in the side pole test (see Child Occupant Protection). In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of lateral rib compression indicated weak chest protection and the head protection was downgraded to adequate as a result of the incorrect airbag deployment. The front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good protection. The optional 'Radar Brake Support' was included in this assessment and the performance of its autonomous braking system at low speeds was rated as adequate.