在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
84% -
了解详情
![]()
73% -
了解详情
![]()
72% -
了解详情
![]()
57%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
Based on dummy readings alone, the Impreza scored maximum points for protection of the 3 year old in the front and side impacts. The passenger airbag cannot be disabled so a rearward facing child restraint should not be used in that seating position. The label warning of the dangers of doing so was not available in the languages of all the countries in which the car is sold and was not rewarded. The presence of ISOFIX anchorages in the rear outboard seats was not clearly marked.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 16.2 分
骨盆碰撞 3.6 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection offered to pedestrian's legs. The bonnet offered good protection in most areas likely to be hit by a child's head.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | ESP | |
| 性能 | ||
| 适用于 | Front seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 |  |
 |
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
不合格As a result of Euro NCAP's new rating scheme, Subaru have made electronic stability control more widely available. From the middle of February 2009, Subaru Vehicle Dynamics Control is available as standard on most Impreza variants and as an option on all others throughout Europe. Consumers should be aware that some cars in stock may not be equipped with Vehicle Dynamics Control and Euro NCAP encourages them to choose those which are. The car has a seatbelt reminder system for the driver's seat.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Subaru Impreza 2.0R, RHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2009
整备质量 1370kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to Imprezas ordered from February 18 onwards
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal test, the windscreen pillar moving rearward by only 3mm. The knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger were well protected. Subaru showed that occupants of different sizes, or those sat in different positions, would be similarly well protected. High rib deflections indicated poor protection of the chest in the side pole test. Inspection of the car after the side barrier impact revealed that the rear door on the struck side was prevented from opening fully only by the secondary latch, for which the car was penalised. The protection offered against whiplash injury was rated as marginal.