- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
82% -
了解详情
![]()
62% -
了解详情
![]()
65% -
了解详情
![]()
43%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排乘客
驾驶员
车碰
柱碰
后排座椅
前排座椅
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the 10 year dummy's neck was rated as poor, based on dummy readings of neck tensile forces. Similarly, decelerations in the chest of the 6 year dummy indicated poor protection of this body region. In the side impact, both dummies were properly restrained and protected. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Tivoli is designed could be properly installed and accommodated. The user manual states that the front passenger seat is not suitable for iSize restraints and the Tivoli lost points for those restraints in that seating position.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 14.5 分
骨盆碰撞 2.7 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
| 系统名称 | AEBS/FCW | |||
| 类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
| 运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
| 其他信息 | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | |||
| 规避 | 缓解 | |||
|
成人从远端横穿
|
时速最高 20 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 45 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
|
成人从近端横穿 - 25%
|
时速最高 30 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 55 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
|
成人从近端横穿 - 75%
|
时速最高 45 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 55 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
|
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
|
时速最高 25 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 45 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
The protection provided by the bonnet to a pedestrian's head was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs, with good results recorded at all test locations. However, the protection provided to the pelvis was more mixed, ranging from good to poor. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system can detect pedestrians and performed well in Euro NCAP's tests, with collision avoidance or mitigation in several of the test scenarios.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
| 系统名称 | AEBS/FCW | |||
| 类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| 运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
| 其他信息 | Default On | |||
| 性能 | | ||||
| 仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
| 运行速度 | 8-180 公里/小时 | 8-180 公里/小时 | ||
| 接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 50 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 70 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
| 接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 55 公里时避免碰撞。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
| 近距离跟车 | ||||
| 前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
| 前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
| 远距离跟车 | ||||
| 前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
| 前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
The XLV has, as standard, a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. Autonomous emergency braking is, from February 2018, standard equipment and operates at highway speeds. Tests of this functionality demonstrated good performance, with accident avoidance or mitigation in several of the scenarios tested.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 SsangYong Tivoli diesel, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2016
整备质量 1435kg
评级适用的 VIN - all XLVs from February 2018
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The SsangYong XLV is exactly the same as the SsangYong Tivoli apart from a slightly extended rear end. In terms of safety performance, the two cars are identical. The results presented here for the XLV are based on tests conducted on the better-selling Tivoli. The same scores and rating applies to both vehicles.
The rating for the Ssangyong XLV was first published in 2016. At that time, autonomous emergency braking was sold as an option, as part of a safety pack, and Euro NCAP published two ratings: one with only standard equipment and another with the safety pack. Since February 2018, the content of the safety pack - AEB City, AEB Inter-urban and AEB Pedestrian - has been made standard equipment and the rating has been changed to reflect this change.
The passenger compartment remained stable in the offset deformable frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. SsangYong showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Readings of chest compression indicated marginal protection of that body region. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good except for the chest, protection of which was adequate. However, proper retention of the rear dummy failed, allowing excessive forward movement and protection of the head was rated as poor. As a result, the carlost all points for that dummy. SsangYong are investigating the cause of the failure. In the side barrier impact, maximum points were scored, with good protection of all critical body areas. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other critical body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. From February 2018, the XLV has an autonomous emergency braking system as standard equipment. This system operates at low speeds, typical of city driving, where many whiplash injuries are caused. The system scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests, with full avoidance at all speeds when tested against a stationary car.