- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset and side barrier tests, both dummies were properly restrained throughout the impacts. In the frontal test, protection was good or adequate except for the chest of the 6 year dummy, for which dummy measurements of deceleration indicated marginal protection. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good for both the 6 and 10 year children. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. In Euro NCAP's installation tests, all restraints could be properly installed and accommodated by the Ateca.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 14.5 分
骨盆碰撞 3.8 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Front Assist | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | |||
规避 | 缓解 | |||
成人从远端横穿
|
时速最高 45 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 25%
|
时速最高 35 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 75%
|
时速最高 45 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
|
时速最高 30 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 |
The bonnet showed predominantly adequate or marginal results for the protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian. The bumper showed good results at all test locations and scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. However, protection of the pelvis area was more mixed with areas of good and poor protection. The autonomous emergency braking system is able to detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and performed well in Euro NCAP's tests of this functionality.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Assistance System |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Front Assist | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On; Supplementary Warning | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 10-210 公里/小时 | 30-210 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 45 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 75 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 70 公里时避免碰撞。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 |
Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system at highway speeds demonstrated good performance, the impact in most cases being avoided or mitigated. The Ateca has a standard-fit seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats and also a driver-set speed limiter. A lane assistance system is also available but, as it is an option, it was not included in this assessment.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 SEAT Ateca 1.6 diesel, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2016
整备质量 1300kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Atecas of the specification tested
级别 Small Off-Road 4x4
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性










在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Ateca remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and the passenger. SEAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for all critical body areas and was good for the rear passenger except for the chest, protection of which was marginal. In the side barrier test, the side curtain airbag did not deploy as intended and, while dummy readings were good, the score for the head was penalised and protection for this part of the body was rated as adequate. The same penalty was applied in the side pole test, even though the airbag deployed correctly. Protection of the head and the chest was rated as adequate and dummy readings indicated good protection of all other body regions. Tests on the front seats and head restraints showed good protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats showed that occupants would also be well protected in those positions. The Ateca has an autonomous emergency braking system as standard and tests showed it to be good at avoiding or mitigating low speed accidents where whiplash injuries are often caused.