- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the 10 year dummy was good. However, readings from the 6 year dummy indicated weak protection of the chest and marginal protection of the neck. In the side barrier test, protection of the 6 year dummy was good but chest decelerations indicated poor protection of that part of the body for the 10 year dummy. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Ibiza is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 16.6 分
骨盆碰撞 4.7 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Front Assist | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | |||
规避 | 缓解 | |||
成人从远端横穿
|
时速最高 45 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 55 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 25%
|
时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 55 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 75%
|
时速最高 45 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 50 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
|
时速最高 35 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 45 公里时缓解碰撞 |
The bonnet surface provided good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian but performance was weak and poor in tests around the windscreen pillars. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good at all test locations. Protection of the pelvis was also predominantly good or adequate (note: from the 2021 facelift, pelvis protection is noticeably worse with predominantly poor results). The autonomous emergency braking system can detect pedestrians as well as other vehicles. In tests, the system showed good performance, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most test scenarios and speeds.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Cruise Control |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Front Assist | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On; Supplementary Warning | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 10-210 公里/小时 | 10-210 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 65 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 70 公里时避免碰撞。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 |
A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and rear seats. Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system at highway speeds demonstrated good performance. The Arona has a driver-set speed limitation system as standard equipment but is not equipped with a lane assistance system.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 SEAT Arona 1.0 'Excellence', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1112kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Aronas
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性








在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The SEAT Arona is structurally almost identical to the SEAT Ibiza rated earlier in 2017 by Euro NCAP, and has the same fitment of safety equipment. Some additional tests have been conducted and the Arona has performed at least as well as the Ibiza in these. Accordingly, this assessment is based on that of the Ibiza and the results of the additional tests.
The passenger compartment remained stable in the front offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. SEAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier impact, protection of the driver and passenger was good or adequate and the Arona scored fractionally better than the Ibiza. In the side barrier test, good protection was provided to all critical parts of the body and the car scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash protection in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. An autonomous emergency braking system is fitted as standard. In tests of its functionality at low speeds typical of city driving at which many whiplash injuries are caused, the system performed well, with collisions avoided at all test speeds.