- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
73% -
了解详情
![]()
75% -
了解详情
![]()
58% -
了解详情
![]()
64%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
-
![]()
正面偏置可变形移动壁障![]()
-
![]()
全宽刚性壁障
-
![]()
侧面移动壁障
![]()
侧面柱碰撞
-
![]()
远端偏移
![]()
乘员相互碰撞
后排座椅
前排座椅
| 救援表 |
Available, ISO compliant
|
|||
| 先进的自动紧急呼叫 | Not available | |||
| 连环碰撞制动器系统 | Available | |||
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
试验车辆未安装但可选配-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
 |
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & Easyfix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as weak, based on measurements of tensile forces. Protection of the neck of the 6 year dummy was marginal, as was that of the head of both dummies. However, in the side barrier impact, protection was rated as good for all critical body areas of both the 6 and 10 year dummies, and the Mokka scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The rear centre seat cannot accommodate universal restraints making use of the adult seatbelt. Otherwise, all restraints could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 15.3 分
骨盆碰撞 6.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
| 系统名称 | Active emergency braking | |||
| 类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
| 运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
| 性能 | | ||||
| 自动刹车功能 | ||||
- 白天
- 夜间
白天
-
车辆向站立不动的行人方向倒车
-
行人横穿车辆转弯将驶入的道路
-
成人横穿道路
-
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
-
成人沿道路前行
夜间
-
成人横穿道路
-
成人沿道路前行
The protection offers to the head of struck pedestrian was mostly good or adequate on the bonnet surface, with some poor results along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians’ legs and also to the pelvis area. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Mokka detects vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed adequately. A more advanced system is available as an option which also detects cyclists.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | Speed Reading Recommendation Road Sign Recognition |
| 限速信息功能 | Camera based, subsigns supported |
| 调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
| 适用于 | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
| 乘员检测 | |
|
|
|
|||
| 系统名称 | Driver Drowsiness Alert |
| 类型 | Steering inputs |
| 运行自 | 50 公里/小时 |
| 系统名称 | Lane Keeping Assist |
| 类型 | LKA and ELK |
| 运行自 | 65 公里/小时 |
| 性能 | |
| 紧急车道保持 | |
| 车道保持辅助系统 | |
| 人機接口 | |
| 系统名称 | Active emergency braking | |||
| 类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
| 运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
| 所用传感器 | Camera only | |||
- 仅限自动刹车功能
- 驾驶员的警告反应
仅限自动刹车功能
-
测试车辆转弯穿过接近车辆前方道路
-
接近静止车辆 左偏置
-
接近静止车辆 无偏置
-
接近静止车辆 右偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 左偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 无偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 右偏置
-
接近制动车辆
驾驶员的警告反应
-
接近静止车辆 左偏置
-
接近静止车辆 无偏置
-
接近静止车辆 右偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 左偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 无偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 右偏置
-
接近制动车辆
The Mokka has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats and is equipped with a system to monitor driver fatigue or impairment. Local speed limits are detected and the information provided to the driver who can then set the speed limiter appropriately. A lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path when it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations to prevent the car leaving the road, for example. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system marginally in tests of its response to other vehicles.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Opel/Vauxhall Mokka, 1.2 petrol 'Elegance', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2021
整备质量 1217kg
评级适用的 VIN - ALL Mokkas, including Mokka-e
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
| Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | ||||
| 5 door hatchback | 1.2 petrol (74kW*, 96kW) | Mokka | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.5 diesel (81kW) | Mokka | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door hatchback | Electric (100kW) | e-Mokka | 4 x 2 | |
|
* Tested variant
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Mokka remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection of the driver dummy’s chest was rated as marginal, based on measurements of compression during the test. Protection of the driver’s knees and femurs, and right tibia, were also rated as marginal. Analysis of the deformable impact barrier after the test, and of decelerations of the trolley during the test, indicated that the Mokka would be a benign crash partner in collisions with other vehicles. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection was rated as good or adequate for all critical body regions, for both the front driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier impact, protection was good for all critical body areas and the Mokka scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, chest protection was marginal and that of other body regions was good. An assessment of dummy excursion (the extent to which the dummy moves to the opposite side of the car in an impact from the far side), demonstrated poor performance. The Mokka does not have a counter-measure for occupant to occupant impacts in a side impact. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.