- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
61% -
了解详情
![]()
60% -
了解详情
![]()
58% -
了解详情
![]()
25%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排乘客
驾驶员
车碰
柱碰
后排座椅
前排座椅
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
 |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
 |
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
 |
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck and chest of the 6 year dummy was weak, and that of the neck of the 10 year dummy was poor. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The Karl is not compatible with i-Size restraints and, as a result, the installation check of any such restraints was deemed a fail. In addition, the large rearward-facing Group 0+/1 restraint could not be accommodated in the rear centre position.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 15.9 分
骨盆碰撞 2.6 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed with areas showing good results and others, mainly on the stiff windscreen pillars, giving poor results. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was predominantly poor.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
The Karl has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. A lane departure warning system and a driver-set speed limiter are available as an option but are not included in this rating.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Opel Karl 1.0 'Enjoy', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2017
整备质量 920kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Karls
级别 微型车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
| Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |||
| 5 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol* | 4 x 2 |  |
|
| 5 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol + LPG (Bi-fuel) | 4 x 2 | |
N/A |
* Tested variant
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The Karl was originally assessed by Euro NCAP in 2015. For this re-assessment, most tests have been re-done as the test protocols have changed in the intervening two years. However, where the car and test protocols are unchanged, results have been carried over from the 2015 assessment.
The passenger compartment of the Karl remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Opel showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, the pelvis of the rear passenger dummy slipped beneath the lap portion of the seatbelt, and protection of this body area was rated as poor. Protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression. Protection of all critical body areas was good for the driver dummy. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical parts of the body was good and the Karl scored maximum points. However, in the more severe side pole impact, the head 'bottomed out' the curtain airbag and the resulting high decelerations indicated poor protection of this body area. Chest protection was rated as marginal based on dummy readings of rib compression. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated marginal whiplash protection.