- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
90% -
了解详情
![]()
83% -
了解详情
![]()
78% -
了解详情
![]()
72%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排乘客
驾驶员
车碰
柱碰
后排座椅
前排座椅
-
接近静止车辆：左偏置
-
接近静止车辆：无偏置
-
接近静止车辆：右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装
严重安全问题| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings of neck tension in the 10-year dummy indicated poor protection of this body area. Otherwise, protection was good. For the 6-year dummy, protection of the neck was marginal. In the side barrier test, protection of both child dummies was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in this seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the G-Class is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 15.1 分
骨盆碰撞 5.9 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
| 系统名称 | Active Brake Assist | |||
| 类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
| 运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
| 性能 | | ||||
| 自动刹车功能 | ||||
- 白天
- 夜间
白天
-
成人横穿道路
-
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
-
成人沿道路前行
夜间
-
成人横穿道路
-
成人沿道路前行
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was marginal or adequate over most of its surface, with areas of good and poor performance. Protection of pedestrian's legs was good or adequate, as was the protection offered to the pelvis. The AEB system can detect pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. The system performed well when tested for its reaction to vulnerable road users such as these.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | Speed Limit Assist |
| 限速信息功能 | Camera & Map |
| 调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
| 适用于 | Not available | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
| 乘员检测 | |
|
|
|
|||
| 系统名称 | Active Lane Keeping Assist |
| 类型 | LKA (including LDW) and ELK |
| 运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
| 性能 | |
| 紧急车道保持 | |
| 车道保持辅助系统 | |
| 人機接口 | |
| 系统名称 | Active Brake Assist | |||
| 类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
| 运行自 | 7 公里/小时 | |||
| 其他信息 | Restraint activation | |||
- 仅限自动刹车功能
- 驾驶员的警告反应
仅限自动刹车功能
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 左偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 无偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 右偏置
-
接近制动车辆
驾驶员的警告反应
-
接近静止车辆 左偏置
-
接近静止车辆 无偏置
-
接近静止车辆 右偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 左偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 无偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 右偏置
-
接近制动车辆
The AEB system gave generally good results in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. The car has a lane assistance system which helps prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane but can also intervene in some more critical situations. The speed control system uses digital mapping combined with a camera to identify what the local speed limit is and to inform the driver, who can then set the limiter to the appropriate speed. A seatbelt reminder is standard for front and rear seats.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Mercedes-Benz G350d, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2019
整备质量 2451kg
评级适用的 VIN - all G-Class
级别 大型越野
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
| Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | ||||
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | G350d* | 4 x 4 |  |
|
| 5 door SUV | 4.0 petrol | G500 | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 4.0 petrol | G63 | 4 x 4 | |
|
* Tested variant
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the G-Class remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Mercedes-Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Chest compression in the driver dummy indicated weak protection of this body region. In the full-width rigid barrier test, chest protection was marginal for the driver's chest but was good for all other critical body areas. For the rear dummy, dummy readings of chest compression indicated marginal protection. However, a high load in the shoulder belt pointed to a risk of injury which the dummy is not able to measure, and protection of the chest was penalised and downrated to 'weak'. In both the side barrier test and the side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the G-Class scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused.