- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, good or adequate protection was provided to all critical body areas of both child dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of the head of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on measured accelerations, but that of all other body regions was good. The front passenger airbag is automatically disabled when a rearward-facing child restraint is put in that seating position. Tests showed that the system worked robustly and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 20.6 分
骨盆碰撞 2.4 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Active Brake Assist | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 7 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
前座乘客侧骑行者,视线受阻
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The C-Class has an ‘active’ bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been hit and actuators lift the bonnet to provide more clearance to the hard structures in the engine compartment. Mercedes-Benz showed that the system responded correctly to various pedestrian statures and over a wide range of speeds. Accordingly, the system was tested with the bonnet in the raised (deployed) position. The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was good at almost all test locations. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test points but the protection provided to the pelvis by the front edge of the bonnet was mixed. The C-Class has an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system which can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians. The system’s response to cyclists was good, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Limit Assist |
限速信息功能 | Camera based |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Attention Assist |
类型 | Steering input |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
系统名称 | Active Lane Keeping Assist |
类型 | LKA and ELK |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
所用传感器 | camera and radar |
The C-Class has a seatbelt reminder system on the front and rear seating positions. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles, with collisions avoided in the great majority of test scenarios. A camera-based speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit and provides the information to the driver, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately. A lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and intervenes more aggressively in some more critical situations.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 高级安全奖
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Mercedes-Benz C 180 AMG Line, LHD
车身式样 - 4 door saloon
公布年份 2022
整备质量 1625kg
评级适用的 VIN - W1K206****R053970 and W1K206****F054956
级别 大型家用车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
高级安全奖
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
4 door saloon | 1.5 petrol | C 180*, C 200 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | 1.5 petrol | C 200 4MATIC | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | 2.0 petrol | C 300 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | 2.0 petrol | C 300 4MATIC | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | 2.0 diesel | C 200 d, C 220 d, C 300 d | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door saloon | 2.0 diesel | C 220 d 4MATIC | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.5 petrol | C 180*, C 200 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 1.5 petrol | C 200 4MATIC | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 2.0 petrol | C 300 | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 2.0 petrol | C 300 4MATIC | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door estate | 2.0 diesel | C 200 d | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the C-Class remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mercedes-Benz showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the C-Class would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good protection was provided to all critical body areas of the driver and rear passenger and the C-Class scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In both the side barrier and pole impact tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The C-Class has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. However, Mercedes-Benz could not demonstrate that the airbag provided symmetrical protection (i.e. that it provided the same level of protection when the impact was on the passenger’s side as it did when struck on the driver’s side) and a penalty was applied. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The C-Class has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions.