- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the 6 year and 10 year dummies was good or adequate, except for the neck of the 10 year dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of neck tension. In the side barrier impact, protection was good for all critical body areas of both dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Velar is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 16.2 分
骨盆碰撞 3.1 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | |||
规避 | 缓解 | |||
成人从远端横穿
|
时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 25%
|
时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 75%
|
时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
|
时速最高 45 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 |
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface, with some weak and poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs while protection of the pelvis areas was more mixed, with good and poor results recorded. The autonomous emergency braking system can detect pedestrians and, in tests of this functionality, performed well, with scoring maximum points with collisions avoided or mitigated in all test scenarios.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Adaptive Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 10km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Departure Warning |
类型 | Lane Departure Warning |
运行自 | 50 公里/小时 |
警告 | Audible |
性能 | |
LDW 确认试验
|
Pass |
系统名称 | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 5-85 公里/小时 | 30-85 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 45 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 80 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 60 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 70 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 |
Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system at highway speeds demonstrated good performance, with collisions avoided or mitigated in all tests. A seatbelt reminder is standard equipment for the front and rear seats, as is a driver-set speed limiter and lane-departure warning system.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Range Rover Velar 2.0 diesel 4x4, RHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1928kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Velars
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性










在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Velar remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Protection of the knees and femurs was good for both dummies and a similar level of protection is provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid-barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression. Otherwise, protection of the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the Velar scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. The Velar has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. Tests of the functionality of this system at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur showed good performance, with collisions avoided at almost all test speeds.