在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
92% -
了解详情
![]()
79% -
了解详情
![]()
67% -
了解详情
![]()
74%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
试验车辆未安装但可选配-
不超过 13 kg 的婴儿
-
不超过 18 kg 的婴儿和学步儿童
-
9 至 18 kg 的学步儿童
-
18 kg 以上的学步儿童
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装
严重安全问题| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the Cherokee scored maximum points for its protection of both the 3 year and the 1½ year infants. Forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minmising the likelihood of dangerous head contact with parts of the car interior. The airbag for the front passenger seat cannot be disabled so a rearward-facing child restraint should not be used in that seating position. The labels warning of the dangers of doing so were not permanently attached to the sun visor, so did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements. All the types of child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the vehicle.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 16.9 分
骨盆碰撞 1.6 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas tested, and scored maximum points. However, the front edge of the bonnet showed poor levels of protection to the pelvis region in most test locations. The bonnet surface gave mixed results, with good and adequate performance in many areas and poor results primarily around the stiff windscreen pillars.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 限速功能 | Manually Set |
| 系统名称 | ESC | |
| 性能 | ||
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.962% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 2.344% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.91 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on all Jeep Cherokees, and the system met Euro NCAP's test requirements. The car also has a standard-fit seatbelt reminder system covering the front and rear seats. A driver-set warning-only speed assistance system is standard and met the test requirements for systems of that type.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Jeep Cherokee 2.0 diesel 'Longitude', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2013
整备质量 1788kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all Cherokees of the specification tested
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Jeep showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side impact barrier test, the Cherokee scored maximum points with good protection of all body regions. In the more severe side impact pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. The seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.