- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the 6 and 10 year old dummies was good apart from the neck, for which tensile forces indicated marginal protection and, for the 10 year dummy, the chest, for which decelerations indicated a marginal level of protection. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 13.7 分
骨盆碰撞 6.0 分
腿部碰撞 5.1 分
系统名称 | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
其他信息 | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | |||
规避 | 缓解 | |||
成人从远端横穿
|
时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 55 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 25%
|
时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 75%
|
时速最高 60 公里时避免碰撞 | |||
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
|
时速最高 30 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 45 公里时缓解碰撞 |
The bonnet provided predominantly adequate or marginal protection for the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs by the bumper was good at most test locations while protection of the pelvis was good at all points tested. The autonomous emergency braking system reacts when pedestrians are in danger of being struck. The system performed well in Euro NCAP's tests, managing to avoid collisions or to mitigate their severity in several of the test scenarios.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Keep Assist System |
类型 | Lane Keep Assist and Lane Departure Warning |
运行自 | 60 公里/小时 |
警告 | Audible and Visual |
性能 | |
LKA 确认试验
|
Pass (5/5) |
LDW 确认试验
|
Pass |
系统名称 | Autonomous Emergency Braking | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 8 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 8-180 公里/小时 | 8-180 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 65 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 80 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 70 公里时避免碰撞。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 |
The Ioniq has as standard: a seatbelt reminder system for front and rear passengers; a driver-set speed limiter; a lane support system that warns the driver when the car is drifting over a lane marking and gently steers the car away from the lane edge; and an autonomous emergency braking system which operates at highway speeds and which performed well in Euro NCAP's tests, managing to avoid collision in many of the test scenarios.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Hyundai Ioniq Hybrid
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2016
整备质量 1370kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Ioniqs including electric and PHEV
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性












在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Ioniq remained stable in the offset deformable barrier frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions. In the full width rigid barrier test, readings from the rear passenger dummy indicated marginal protection of the chest. The pelvis slipped under the lap part of the seatbelt, indicated by a sudden drop in load, and protection of this body region was rated as poor. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good and full points were scored. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection. A standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system provides additional protection against whiplash injury. In Euro NCAP's tests, the system scored full points, avoiding collisions against a stationary car at all test speeds.