- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection for both child dummies. However, analysis of the film revealed that the seat belt had partially slipped off the shoulder of the 10 year dummy and, as a result, the overall score for the test was penalised. In the side barrier impact, dummy readings of accelerations indicated weak protection of the head of the 10 year dummy. Otherwise, protection of all critical body areas was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver about the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Some universal child restraints were unstable when positioned in the rear centre seating position but, otherwise, all systems for which the HR-V is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 17.2 分
骨盆碰撞 0.2 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Collision Mitigation Braking System | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
前座乘客侧骑行者,视线受阻
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test points. However, protection of the pelvis was poor almost everywhere along the front edge of the bonnet. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the HR-V can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in almost all scenarios. Likewise, the system’s response to cyclists was good.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
限速信息功能 | Camera based, subsigns supported |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Front and rear seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Road Departure Mitigation System (RDM) |
类型 | LKA and ELK |
运行自 | 65 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Collision Mitigation Braking System | |||
类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
所用传感器 | camera |
In tests of its response to other vehicles, the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well. A camera-based speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit. This information is provided to the driver who can choose to allow the car adapt the speed limiter as appropriate. A lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and can also intervene in more critical situations to avoid road departure, for example. A seat belt reminder is provided for the front and rear seats but there is no system to monitor for fatigued driving.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Honda HR-V 1.5 hybrid 'Advance', RHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2022
整备质量 1389kg
评级适用的 VIN - all HR-Vs
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 1.5 litre hybrid | ADVANCE STYLE | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 litre hybrid | ADVANCE | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 1.5 litre hybrid | ELEGANCE | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the HR-V remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Honda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the HR-V would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger dummy was rated as marginal, based on measurements of compression. Otherwise, protection of both dummies was good or adequate. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The HR-V does not have a counter-measure, such as a centre airbag, to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The HR-V has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash but is not equipped with a system to prevent secondary impacts in the event of a collision.