-
了解详情
![]()
86% -
了解详情
![]()
79% -
了解详情
![]()
54% -
了解详情
![]()
86%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
Maximum points were scored for protection of the 3 year infant based on the dummy result from the impact tests. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that position. However, information presented to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. A warning label clearly warns of the danger of using a rearward facing child seat in the passenger seat without first disabling the airbag, but the information is not available in all European languages. The presence of ISOFIX anchorages in the rear outboard seats is not clearly marked.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 13.3 分
骨盆碰撞 0 分
腿部碰撞 6 分
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection offered to pedestrians' legs in the area rated by Euro NCAP. However, additional tests showed that some areas beyond the central zone provided poor protection. Most of the zones tested in the area of the bonnet where a child's head might strike also scored maximum points. However, the front edge of the bonnet was rated as poor.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | ESP | |
| 性能 | ||
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 |  |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
不合格Electronic Stability Control is standard equipment on all of the model range. The Accord has a seatbelt reminder system which covers all seating positions.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 高级安全奖
- 评级有效期
规格
试验车型 Honda Accord 2.2 i-DTEC, ES-GT, RHD
车身式样 - 4 door saloon
公布年份 2009
整备质量 1477kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Accords of the specification tested
级别 大型家用车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
高级安全奖
评级有效期
年度审查和中期改款
The passenger compartment remained stable during the impact. Dummy readings indicated that the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger were well protected. Honda showed that occupants of different sizes and those sitting in different positions would be similarly well protected. The passenger's chest was compressed more than the driver's and this value was used for the calculation of the rating. In the pole side impact, protection of the chest was weak. Protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact was marginal.