- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
70% -
了解详情
![]()
72% -
了解详情
![]()
41% -
了解详情
![]()
42%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
-
![]()
正面偏置可变形移动壁障![]()
-
![]()
全宽刚性壁障
-
![]()
侧面移动壁障
![]()
侧面柱碰撞
-
![]()
远端偏移
![]()
乘员相互碰撞
后排座椅
前排座椅
| 救援表 |
Available, ISO compliant
|
|||
| 先进的自动紧急呼叫 | Not available | |||
| 连环碰撞制动器系统 | Not available | |||
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
试验车辆未安装但可选配-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
小心安装| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
 |
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & Easyfix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the chest and neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as weak, based on dummy readings during the impact. For the 6 year dummy, protection of the neck was marginal while that of the head and chest was adequate and good respectively. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraints for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated. One, a full sized rearward facing toddler restraint, could be fitted in the car with no problem but was deemed a fail because Dacia indicate in the user manual that the car cannot accommodate this (R3) category of restraint.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 14.1 分
骨盆碰撞 2.3 分
腿部碰撞 5.8 分
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations. However, protection of the pelvis was poor over much of the width of the car. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system does not detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | Speed limiter |
| 调速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| 适用于 | Front and rear seats, including third row | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
| 乘员检测 | |
|
|
|
|||
| 系统名称 | Active Emergency Braking | |||
| 类型 | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
| 运行自 | 7 公里/小时 | |||
| 所用传感器 | Radar only | |||
- 仅限自动刹车功能
- 驾驶员的警告反应
仅限自动刹车功能
-
测试车辆转弯穿过接近车辆前方道路
-
接近静止车辆 左偏置
-
接近静止车辆 无偏置
-
接近静止车辆 右偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 左偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 无偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 右偏置
-
接近制动车辆
驾驶员的警告反应
-
接近静止车辆 左偏置
-
接近静止车辆 无偏置
-
接近静止车辆 右偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 左偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 无偏置
-
接近缓慢行驶车辆 右偏置
-
接近制动车辆
A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard but there is no lane assistance. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles with accidents avoided or mitigated in many cases.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Dacia Sandero Stepway 1.0TCe, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2021
整备质量 1111kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Logans
级别 小型家用车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
| Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | |||
| 4 door saloon | 1.0 SCe petrol, manual | 4 x 2 |  |
- |
| 4 door saloon | 1.0 TCe petrol, manual | 4 x 2 | |
- |
| 4 door saloon | 1.0 TCe petrol, automatic | 4 x 2 | |
- |
| 4 door saloon | 1.0 LPG, manual | 4 x 2 | |
- |
Tested car: Dacia Sandero Stepway
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The Dacia Logan is structurally identical to the Sandero Stepway but has a different roof-line towards the rear. Based on some additional tests and data reviewed by Euro NCAP, the star rating of the Sandero Stepway can be applied also to the Dacia Logan.
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated protection that was at least adequate for the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions, and protection for this part of the body was downgraded to marginal. Chest protection was also rated as marginal for both front seat occupants, based on dummy readings of chest compression. Analysis of the deformable barrier after the test revealed that it would be a benign crash opponent. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the front seat driver and rear seat passenger was at least adequate for all critical parts of the body. In the side barrier test, representing an impact by another vehicle, chest compression indicated a marginal level of protection. In the side pole test, protection of all critical body areas was rated as good or adequate. An assessment of the excursion of an occupant in a far-side impact showed poor protection and the car does not have a counter-measure, such as a centre airbag, for this accident type. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric analysis of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.