- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
71% -
了解详情
![]()
66% -
了解详情
![]()
56% -
了解详情
![]()
37%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
后排乘客
驾驶员
车碰
柱碰
后排座椅
前排座椅
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
试验车辆未安装但可选配-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
| 座椅位置 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
| 乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) |  |
 |
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) |  |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
顺利安装![]()
小心安装![]()
严重安全问题![]()
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, dummy readings in the 6 year dummy indicated marginal chest protection but, otherwise, protection was good or adequate for both dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. The marking of ISOFIX/i-Size anchorages in the rear outboard seats did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements so the installation check of all such restraints is indicated as a partial fail, although the restraints could be installed and accommodated in the car. Universal restraints are not allowed in the front passenger seat so the installation checks are deemed to have failed.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 11.6 分
骨盆碰撞 6.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate but poor results were recorded along the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs and protection of the pelvis was also good at all test locations.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 系统名称 | Manual Speed Limiter |
| 限速信息功能 | N/A |
| 警告功能 | Manually set |
| 限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| 适用于 | All seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
|
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
The Duster has, as standard, a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats, and a driver-set speed limiter.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Dacia Duster 1.5 diesel, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1303kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Dusters
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配，或者作为安全套装的一部分配备![]()
不可用![]()
不适用
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
| Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD |
RHD# |
|||
| 5 door SUV | 1.5 diesel (90 and 110), manual* and auto | 4 x 2 |  |
N/A |
| 5 door SUV | 1.5 diesel (110), manual | 4 x 4 | |
N/A |
| 5 door SUV | 1.6 petrol, manual | 4 x 2 | |
N/A |
| 5 door SUV | 1.6 petrol, manual | 4 x 4 | |
N/A |
| 5 door SUV | 1.2 petrol, manual | 4 x 2 | |
N/A |
| 5 door SUV | 1.2 petrol, manual | 4 x 4 | |
N/A |
* Tested variant
# RHD sales start 2018
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Duster remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger but structures in the dashboard on the driver's side were thought to present a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, head injury values based on decelerations indicated poor protection for this part of the body and all points for the driver dummy were lost. Dummy readings for the head of the rear passenger were good, but it moved too far forward in the test, and protection was rated as marginal. In the side barrier test, the Duster provided good protection to all critical body areas and scored maximum points. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated marginal whiplash protection.