在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








-
接近静止车辆:左偏置
-
接近静止车辆:无偏置
-
接近静止车辆:右偏置
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection was good or adequate for both the 6 and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, protection was good for all critical body areas. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing passenger to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the C5 Aircross is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 13.7 分
骨盆碰撞 6.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Safety+ Pack | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
性能 | | ||||
自动刹车功能 |
-
骑车者横穿
-
骑车者沿道路前行
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate on the bonnet surface but was poor along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of pedestrians' legs and of the pelvis was good at all test locations and maximum points were scored. As standard, the C5 Aircross has a camera-only AEB system which can detect and respond to pedestrians. The camera + radar system included with the optional safety pack can also detect cyclists. In pedestrian tests, the system performed marginally, with some collisions avoided and some mitigated. In cyclist tests, the system performance was adequate.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Limiter with Speed Limit Recognition |
限速信息功能 | Camera based |
调速功能 | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | Not available | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
乘员检测 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane Keeping Assist |
类型 | LKA (including LDW) and ELK |
运行自 | 65 公里/小时 |
性能 | |
紧急车道保持 | |
车道保持辅助系统 | |
人機接口 |
系统名称 | Safety+ Pack | |||
类型 | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 |
The C5 Aircross has a seatbelt reminder system as standard for the front and rear seats. A camera-based speed assistance system is also standard. Local speed limits are identified and the information is provided to the driver, who can set the speed limiter appropriately. A lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane and can also assist in some more critical situations. The camera + radar AEB system which is part of the optional safety pack demonstrated adequate performance when tested at highway speeds, an improvement on the marginal performance shown by the standard camera-only system.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Citroen C5 Aircross 1,5l Hdi Live
安全套装名称 Safety+ Pack
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2019
整备质量 1495kg
评级适用的 VIN - C5 Aircross with optional safety pack
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the C5 Aircross remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knee and femurs of the driver and dummy. Citroën showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Readings in the tibia indicated weak protection of the lower leg for the driver but all other body regions were protected well or adequately. In the full-width, rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good or adequate for all critical body areas. For the rear passenger dummy, head deceleration indicated marginal protection. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good and the car scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, rib compressions indicated marginal protection for the chest. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur.