在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
-
了解详情
![]()
94% -
了解详情
![]()
83% -
了解详情
![]()
57% -
了解详情
![]()
71%
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
驾驶员
前排座椅
车碰
柱碰
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
乘客
外侧
中间
![]()
车辆标配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备
试验车辆未安装但可选配Forward movement of this dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both the 3 year and the 18 month dummy were properly restrained by their restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contact. The passenger airbag can be disabled, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the system did not meet Euro NCAP's requirements regarding the clarity of information provided to the driver, and the system was not rewarded. Clear information is provided in the car regarding the danger of using a rearward facing restraint in the passenger seat without first disabling the airbag.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
头部碰撞 14.7 分
骨盆碰撞 1.8 分
腿部碰撞 4.0 分
The bumper provided good protection in most areas tested but was poor in some. The front edge of the bonnet was predominantly poor. In most areas likely to be struck by a child's head, the bonnet provided good protection but it offered predominantly poor protection in those areas likely to be struck by the head of an adult.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
| 性能 | ||
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.00 s | 1.523% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 车辆偏航角速度 @ COS + 1.75 s | 4.954% | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 侧向位移 @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.09 m | 符合 ECE 要求 |
| 适用于 | Front seats | ||
| 警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
| 视觉 | |
|
 |
| 听觉 | |
|
|
|
|||
不合格--safetyAssistCommentEN--
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Chevrolet Malibu 2.4 LTZ, LHD
车身式样 - 4 door saloon
公布年份 2011
整备质量 1605kg
评级适用的 VIN - applies to all Malibus of the specification tested
级别 大型家用车
安全设备
注：车辆上可能会配备其他设备，但在试验年份未予考虑。
![]()
车辆标配![]()
车辆选配![]()
试验车辆未安装但可选配![]()
未配备![]()
不适用
车辆选配视频
评级有效性
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
In the frontal test, the passenger compartment remained stable. Maximum points were scored for protection of the driver, all body areas being well protected. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Chevrolet showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier impact, the Malibu scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the abdomen was marginal. The seat and reactive head restraint provided good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.