- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on readings of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical body areas, and was the same in the repeat test of the X4. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 19.5 分
骨盆碰撞 0.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Person warning with City light braking function | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Defaults on for every journey; operates in low ambient light | |||
规避 | 缓解 | |||
成人从远端横穿
|
时速最高 35 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 25%
|
时速最高 35 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 75%
|
时速最高 25 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 45 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
|
时速最高 25 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 45 公里时缓解碰撞 |
The X3 and X4 have an 'active', deployable bonnet. Sensors detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to provide greater clearance to the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system worked robustly for different pedestrian statures and across a wide range of speeds. Accordingly, the car was tested with the bonnet in the raised position. Test results were good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs was good at all test locations. However, the protection provided to the pelvis was poor at all locations. In tests of its pedestrian detection, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately, with collisions avoided or mitigated in several test scenarios and speeds.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Manual Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Front-end collision warning with light braking function | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 5 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 5-85 公里/小时 | 5-250 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 65 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 80 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 70 公里时避免碰撞。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 规避 | 规避 |
The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds, with collisions avoided or mitigated in all scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats, as is a driver-set speed limiter.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效期
规格
试验车型 BMW X3 2.0d, LHD
车身式样 - 5 door SUV
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1825kg
评级适用的 VIN - all X3s and X4s
级别 小型越野
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效期
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X3 xDrive20d* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X3 xDrive30i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X3 sDrive20i | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X3 xDrive20i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X3 xDrive30d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X3 M40i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X3 sDrive18d | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X3 M40d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X4 xDrive20i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X4 xDrive30i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X4 M40i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X4 xDrive20d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.5 diesel | X4 xDrive25d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X4 xDrive30d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X4 M40d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
年度审查和中期改款






The BMW X4 shares a platform with the BMW X3, tested in 2017, and many tests from that assessment are valid for the X4. However, the side structure is different so additional side impact tests have been done to verify that the performance of the X4 is at least as good as the X3. Those tests showed performance that was at least as good as the X3 so the 2017 star rating of the BMW X3 can be considered valid also for the X4.
The passenger compartment of the X3 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate, except the chest of the rear dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on chest compression. The X3 scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all critical body areas. The X4 also provided good protection to all critical body regions in this test. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection, while that of other body areas was good. In the pole test of the X4, protection of all critical parts of the body was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused, with collisions avoided at all test speeds.