Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Mer information finns på fliken Betygets giltighet i bedömningen
-
Läs mer
![]()
83% -
Läs mer
![]()
82% -
Läs mer
![]()
50% -
Läs mer
![]()
71%
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Passagerare
Förare
Framsäte
Bil
Stolpe
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
![]()
Monteras på fordonet som standard![]()
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval![]()
Ej tillgänglig
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillvalBased on dummy readings from the impact tests, the Freemont scored maximum points for protection of both the 18 month and 3 year old. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side barrier test, both child dummies were properly contained within the shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contacts. The front passenger airbag cannot be disabled, so a rearward facing child restraint cannot be used in that seating position. The dangers of using a rearward facing seat in that position are not labelled in all the required languages.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Slag mot huvud 12,0 P
Slag mot bäcken 0,0 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
The Freemont has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to provide greater clearance to hard structures underneath. FIAT showed that the system detected pedestrians of different statures and operated over a range speeds, so the Freemont was tested with the system deployed. In those areas likely to be struck by the head of a child, the car provided protection which was predominantly poor or marginal. For the head of an adult, protection was good in some areas but poor in others. The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it offered pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet gave poor protection and scored no points.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
| Prestanda | ||
| Fordonets girhastighet @ COS + 1.00 s | 0% | uppfyller ECE-krav |
| Fordonets girhastighet @ COS + 1.75 s | 0% | uppfyller ECE-krav |
| Lateral förflyttning @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.91 m | uppfyller ECE-krav |
| Gäller för | Front seats | ||
| Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
| Visuell | |
|
 |
| Akustisk | |
|
|
|
|||
UnderkändElectronic stability control is standard and met Euro NCAP's test requirements. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver and front passenger seats. A speed limitation device is not available on the Freemont.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell Fiat Freemont 2.0 diesel 'Urban', LHD
Karosstyp - 5 door MPV
Årsmodell 2011
Tjänstevikt 1907kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - applies to all Freemonts of the specification tested
Klass Stor mpv
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
![]()
Monteras på fordonet som standard![]()
Monteras på fordonet som tillval![]()
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval![]()
Ej tillgänglig![]()
Gäller ej
Monteras på fordonet som tillvalVideor
Betyg giltighet
Mer information finns i avsnittet Allmänna kommentarer i bedömningen
Dela
The passenger cell of the Freemont remained stable in the frontal impact. Although dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger, the steering column presented a hazard for occupants of different sizes and those sat in different positions, and protection for this body area was rated as marginal. Maximum points were scored for protection of the front passenger, with good protection of all body areas. In Freemont scored maximum points in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak protection of the chest. The Freemont has an 'active' head restraint, which moves forward in the event of a rear-end collision to provide greater support for the neck. In Euro NCAP's tests, the system worked well and protection against whiplash injuries in a rear-end collision was rated as good.