- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Läs mer
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig








- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig


Passagerare
yttersäten
Mitten
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Inte monterad på provfordonet men finns som tillval
Ej tillgänglig
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Universalt fastspänd barnstol
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
Sätesposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fram | 2:a raden | |||
Passagerare | Vänster | Mitten | Höger | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Montera utan problem
montera försiktigt
kritiskt säkerhetsproblem
montering är inte tillåten
In the front offset test, dummy readings indicate weak protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy and marginal protection of the neck and chest of the 6 year dummy. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, the information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag was not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded. Because of this, installation of the belt-mounted universal restraints was deemed a failure. The Giulietta does not have i-Size compatible seating positions, so failed the installation test for such restraints.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig

Slag mot huvud 13,6 P
Slag mot bäcken 5,4 P
Slag mot ben 6,0 P
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, with roughly equal areas of good and poor protection. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs was good while that of the pelvis was mixed.
- Ok
- Tillfredsställande
- Gränsfall
- Svag
- Dålig
Gäller för | All seats | ||
Varning | Förarsäte | passagerare fram | passagerare bak |
Visuell | |||
Akustisk | |||
|
The Giulietta has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats and no other safety equipment that is assessed by Euro NCAP.
- Specifikationer
- Säkerhetsutrustning
- Videor
- Betyg giltighet
Specifikationer
Testad modell Alfa Romeo Giulietta1.6 Mjet 'Super', LHD
Karosstyp - 5 door hatchback
Årsmodell 2017
Tjänstevikt 1355kg
Bedömning avser VIN fr.o.m. - all Giuliettas
Klass Liten familj
Säkerhetsutrustning
Obs: Det kan finnas annan utrustning tillgänglig bilen men som inte har beaktats under teståret.
Monteras på fordonet som standard
Anpassad till bilen som en del av säkerhetspaketet
Inte anpassad till testfordonet men finns tillgänglig som tillval eller som del av säkerhetspaketet
Ej tillgänglig
Gäller ej
Videor
Betyg giltighet
Varianter av modellserien
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback |
1.4 TB 120CV |
4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback |
1.4 TB GPL 120CV |
4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback |
1.4 TURBO MULTI AIR 150CV |
4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback |
1.4 TB MAIR 170CV CM TCT |
4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback |
1.8 TB GDI 240CV QFV TCT |
4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback |
1,6 JTDm 120 CV CM 6M* |
4 X 2 |
![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback |
1,6 JTDm 120 CV TCT |
4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback |
2,0 JTDm 150 CV CM 6M |
4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback |
2,0 JTDm 175 CV TCT |
4 X 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant
Årliga översyner och facelifts







The passenger compartment of the Giulietta remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Alfa Romeo showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest was rated as weak for the rear passenger, based on readings of chest compression and shoulder belt load. Protection of the neck of the driver dummy was also rated as weak. In the side barrier test, the seat-mounted thorax airbag did not deploy correctly, getting trapped behind the intruding trim. Dummy readings were not adversely affected but a penalty was applied to all areas protected by the airbag: thorax, abdomen and pelvis, and protection rated as adequate. As the same airbag is meant to provide protection in the side pole test, the penalties were applied in that test too. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated poor whiplash protection.