-
Lees meer
![]()
52% -
Lees meer
![]()
91% -
Lees meer
![]()
53% -
Lees meer
![]()
57%
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Passagier
Bestuurder
Zitplaats voor
Zitplaats achter
Auto
Paal
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
![]()
In het voertuig als standaard![]()
Niet gemonteerd op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar![]()
Niet beschikbaar
Maximum points were scored in the dynamic tests for its protection of the 3 year and 18 month dummies. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The test vehicle was not equipped with the optional passenger airbag but, where it is fitted, this can be disabled by means of a switch to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in front passenger seat. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Impact op het hoofd 10.2 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 0 Ptn
Impact op de benen 5.9 Ptn
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs in some areas but was marginal in others. Tests against the front edge of the bonnet are not performed for vehicles in this size category. The bonnet surface provided predominantly adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian with weak or poor results recorded primarily at the stiff bonnet edges and windscreen pillars.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
| Systeemnaam | ESP | |
| Resultaat | ||
| Voertuig gierhoeksensor @ COS + 1.00 s | 14200% | voldoet aan ECE-eisen |
| Voertuig gierhoeksensor @ COS + 1.75 s | 15300% | voldoet aan ECE-eisen |
| Zijdelingse verplaatsing @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.35 m | voldoet aan ECE-eisen |
| Geldt voor | Driver's seat | ||
| Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | voorpassagier(s) | achterste passagier(s) |
| Visueel | |
 |
|
| Hoorbaar | |
|
|
|
|||
AfgekeurdElectronic stability control is standard equipment. A seatbelt reminder is available only for the driver's seat. A speed limitation device is standard on passenger vans but, as it is only an option on the cargo-carrying variants, it was not included in the assessment.
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Jaarlijkse updates & facelifts
Specificaties
Getest model Renault Trafic dCi 115 Combi, LHD
Type carrosserie - 8/9 seat van
Bouwjaar 2015
Leeggewicht 2215kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - all Vivaros of the specification tested
Klasse Lichte bedrijfsauto's en personenbusjes
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
![]()
In het voertuig als standaard![]()
In het voertuig als optie![]()
Niet gemonteerd op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar![]()
Niet beschikbaar![]()
Niet van toepassing
In het voertuig als optieVideo's
Jaarlijkse updates & facelifts
Annual Reviews and Facelifts
Euro NCAP determined that the Opel Vivaro is identical to the Renault Trafic in all ways related to safety, including the equipment level. Accordingly, the results of the Trafic are reproduced here for the Vivaro and the rating applies to both vehicles.
Delen
The Vivaro is identical to the Renault Trafic and has the same safety equipment. The rating for the Vivaro is based on tests performed on the Trafic.
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. An airbag for the front seat passenger is standard on passenger-carrying versions but, as it is an only an option on the cargo versions, it was not included in the test. Dummy readings indicated marginal protection of the passenger's chest and the steering column and parts of the facia presented a risk of injury to the knees and femurs of both front seat occupants. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier test with good protection of all body regions. A head/thorax airbag is available as an option but, as it is not standard equipment, the vehicle did not qualify for a side pole impact. A geometric assessment of the seats indicated marginal protection against whiplash injury in the front seats and poor protection in the rear seats.