- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
Meer informatie vindt u in het tabblad Geldigheid van de beoordeling
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Lees meer
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht








-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Offset links
-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Geen offset
-
Naderen van een stilstaande auto: Offset rechts
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht


Passagier
(buitenste zitplaatsen)
Midden
(buitenste zitplaatsen) *
Standaard uitrusting
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig, maar als optie verkrijgbaar
Niet beschikbaar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Kinderzitje met universele gordel
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
Positie stoel | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Voor | 2e rij | 3e rij | ||||
Passagier | Links | Midden | Rechts | Links | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIT i-Size (iSize) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Probleemloze montage
montage met beleid
kritisch veiligheidsprobleem
montage niet toegestaan
In the frontal offset test, readings of tensile forces indicated adequate protection of the neck of the 6-year dummy. Otherwise, protection of critical body areas was good for both dummies. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points. The front passenger airbag is automatically disabled when a rearward-facing child restraint is put in that seating position. Tests showed that the system worked robustly and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht

Impact op het hoofd 19,8 Ptn
Impact op het bekken 0,3 Ptn
Impact op de benen 6,0 Ptn
Systeemnaam | Active Brake Assist | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 7 km/u | |||
Resultaat | | ||||
Auto-brakefunctie |
-
Fietser steekt over
-
Fietser langs de weg
The car has an active, deployable bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet surface to provide greater clearance to the stiff structures in the engine compartment. Mercedes-Benz showed that the system worked robustly for different pedestrian statures and across a wide range of speeds, so tests were performed with the bonnet in the raised position. Protection was good or adequate at almost all test locations on the bonnet. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test positions. However, the protection provided to the pelvis area was poor and no points were scored in this part of the assessment. The AEB system performed well in tests both of its pedestrian detection and its response to cyclists, with collisions avoided in nearly all test scenarios.
- Goed
- Voldoende
- Twijfelachtig
- Zwak
- Slecht
Systeemnaam | Speed Limit Assist |
Snelheidsbegrenzings-informatiefunctie | Camera based |
Snelheidsregelingsfunctie | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Geldt voor | All Seats | ||
Waarschuwing | Bestuurdersstoel | Passagier(s) vooraan | Passagier(s) achteraan |
Visueel | |||
Hoorbaar | |||
Detectie inzittenden | |||
|
Systeemnaam | Active Lane Keeping Assist |
Type | ELK + LKA (including LDW) |
In werking vanaf | 60 km/u |
Resultaat | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Mens-Machine-Interactie |
Systeemnaam | Active Brake Assist | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
In werking vanaf | 7 km/u |
The AEB system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds. A lane assistance system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out lane by warning the driver and gently applying some corrective steering. The system also intervenes more aggressively in some more critical situations. A camera is used to determine the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver who can choose to let the limiter adapt the speed accordingly. The car has a seatbelt reminder system as standard for front and rear seats.
- Specificaties
- Veiligheidsuitrusting
- Video's
- Geldigheid van de beoordeling
Specificaties
Getest model Mercedes-EQ EQB, electric
Type carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Bouwjaar 2019
Leeggewicht 2090kg
VIN vanaf welke de beoordeling van toepassing is - all EQBs
Klasse Kleine SUV
Veiligheidsuitrusting
Opmerking: het voertuig is mogelijk uitgerust met andere voorzieningen maar deze zijn niet meegenomen in het testjaar.
Standaard uitrusting
Uitrusting als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet aanwezig op het testvoertuig maar beschikbaar als optie of als onderdeel van het veiligheidspakket
Niet beschikbaar
Niet van toepassing
Video's
Geldigheid van de beoordeling


Meer informatie vindt u in de sectie Opmerkingen van de beoordeling
The Mercedes-EQ EQB is structurally comparable to the Mercedes-Benz GLB tested in 2019 and shares the same level of safety equipment. Additional tests have been done where the performance of the cars might differ but, otherwise, test results are taken from the GLB.

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body areas of both the driver and passenger, and the car scored maximum points in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good or adequate with the exception of the neck of the driver, for which dummy readings of tensile forces indicated a marginal level of protection. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and maximum points were scored. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated adequate protection for the chest, with other critical parts of the body being well protected. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving at which many whiplash injuries occur.