Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente





- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Centro
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
Both the 3 year and 1½ year dummies were sat in rearward-facing restraints and, in the frontal impact, the heads of both dummies were well contained by the protective shells. The rearward-facing restraint of the 1½ year infant moved forward and damaged the seat back of the front passenger seat. However, this had no influence on dummy results and was not penalised. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of dangerous head contact with parts of the car interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. The dangers of using a rearward-facing restraint without disabling the airbag were clearly explained on labels in the car.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 15,0 Pt
Impatto bacino 2,5 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
The bumper scored maximum points in Euro NCAP's tests, providing good protection to pedestrians' legs in all areas. In most areas likely to be struck by the head of a child, the bonnet provided good protection but provided predominantly poor protection in those areas likely to be struck by the head of an adult.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Nome sistema | ESC | |
Prestazioni | ||
Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.00 s | 26800% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
Imbardata veicolo @ COS + 1.75 s | 19700% | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
Spostamento laterale @ BOS + 1.07 s | 2.97 m | conforme ai requisiti ECE |
Si applica a | Front seats | ||
Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
Visivo | |||
Acustico | |||
|
The 500L has electronic stability control as standard equipment and passed Euro NCAP's test requirements. A driver-set speed limitation device is standard equipment on some variants but not all, and the system was not assessed. Seatbelt reminders for the two front seats are fitted to all variants.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Premi Advanced
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato Fiat 500L 1.4 petrol 'Easy' 4×2, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door hatchback
Anno di costruzione 2012
Peso a vuoto 1245kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - applies to all 500L's of the specification tested
Classe Piccolo monovolume
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come opzione
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Premi Advanced
Validità della valutazione










Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all body regions. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. FIAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the 500L scored maximum points, with good protection of all body areas. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate while that of other body regions was good. The seat and head restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end impact.