- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
Ulteriori informazioni nella scheda Validità della valutazione
- See More
- See More
- See More
- See More
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente








- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente


Passeggero
laterale
Centro
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Non montato sul veicolo di prova, ma disponibile come opzione
Non disponibile
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Sistema di ritenuta con ancoraggio a cinture di sicurezza universali
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
Sedile | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anteriore | 2a fila | |||
Passeggero | Sinistra | Centro | Destra | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installazione senza problemi
Installazione accurata
Problema per la sicurezza
Installazione non consentita
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on readings of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical body areas, and was the same in the repeat test of the X4. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente

Impatto testa 19,5 Pt
Impatto bacino 0,0 Pt
Impatto gambe 6,0 Pt
Nome sistema | Person warning with City light braking function | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo da | 5 Km/h | |||
Ulteriori informazioni | Defaults on for every journey; operates in low ambient light | |||
Evitamento | Mitigazione | |||
Adulto che cammina in attraversamento da parte opposta
|
Collisione evitata fino a 35 km/h | Collisione mitigata fino a 60 km/h | ||
Adulto che cammina in attraversamento dal lato marciapiede -25%
|
Collisione evitata fino a 35 km/h | Collisione mitigata fino a 60 km/h | ||
Adulto che cammina in attraversamento dal lato marciapiede -75%
|
Collisione evitata fino a 25 km/h | Collisione mitigata fino a 45 km/h | ||
Bambino che proviene in corsa da veicoli parcheggiati
|
Collisione evitata fino a 25 km/h | Collisione mitigata fino a 45 km/h |
The X3 and X4 have an 'active', deployable bonnet. Sensors detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to provide greater clearance to the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system worked robustly for different pedestrian statures and across a wide range of speeds. Accordingly, the car was tested with the bonnet in the raised position. Test results were good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs was good at all test locations. However, the protection provided to the pelvis was poor at all locations. In tests of its pedestrian detection, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately, with collisions avoided or mitigated in several test scenarios and speeds.
- Buona
- Adeguata
- Marginale
- Scarsa
- Insufficiente
Nome sistema | Manual Speed Limiter |
Funzione informazione limiti velocità | N/A |
Funzione di avviso | Manually set |
Funzione limitazione velocità | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Si applica a | All seats | ||
Attenzione | Sedile conducente | passeggero(i) anteriore(i) | passeggero(i) posteriore(i) |
Visivo | |||
Acustico | |||
|
Nome sistema | Front-end collision warning with light braking function | |||
Tipo | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
Operativo da | 5 km/h | |||
Ulteriori informazioni | Default On | |||
Prestazioni | | ||||
Solo funzione freno automatico | il conducente reagisce all'avviso | |||
Velocità operativa | 5-85 km/h | 5-250 km/h | ||
avvicinamento a un veicolo fermo | Vedere AEB urbano | Impatto evitato fino a 65 km/h.Velocità impatto ridotta fino a 80 km/h. | ||
avvicinamento a un veicolo più lento | Impatto evitato fino a 70 km/h. | Impatto evitato fino a 80 km/h. | ||
Guida dietro un'auto a breve distanza | ||||
l'auto antistante frena gradualmente | Evitamento | Evitamento | ||
l'auto antistante frena bruscamente | Mitigazione | Mitigazione | ||
Guida dietro un'auto a lunga distanza | ||||
l'auto antistante frena gradualmente | Evitamento | Evitamento | ||
l'auto antistante frena bruscamente | Evitamento | Evitamento |
The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds, with collisions avoided or mitigated in all scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats, as is a driver-set speed limiter.
- Specifiche
- Dotazione di sicurezza
- Video
- Validità della valutazione
Specifiche
Modello testato BMW X3 2.0d, LHD
Tipo carrozzeria - 5 door SUV
Anno di costruzione 2017
Peso a vuoto 1825kg
VIN a cui si riferisce la valutazione - all X3s and X4s
Classe Piccolo SUV
Dotazione di sicurezza
Nota: altre dotazioni possono essere disponibili sul veicolo ma non sono state considerate nell'anno del test.
Montato di serie sul veicolo
Montato sul veicolo come parte del Safety Pack
Non montato sulla vettura testata ma disponibile come opzione o come parte del Safety Pack
Non disponibile
Non applicabile
Video
Validità della valutazione
Varianti della gamma di modelli
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X3 xDrive20d* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X3 xDrive30i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X3 sDrive20i | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X3 xDrive20i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X3 xDrive30d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X3 M40i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X3 sDrive18d | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X3 M40d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | battery electric | iX3 | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X4 xDrive20i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X4 xDrive30i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X4 M40i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X4 xDrive20d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.5 diesel | X4 xDrive25d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X4 xDrive30d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X4 M40d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant








Ulteriori informazioni nella sezione Commenti generali della valutazione
The BMW X4 shares a platform with the BMW X3, tested in 2017, and many tests from that assessment are valid for the X4. However, the side structure is different so additional side impact tests have been done to verify that the performance of the X4 is at least as good as the X3. Those tests showed performance that was at least as good as the X3 so the 2017 star rating of the BMW X3 can be considered valid also for the X4.

The passenger compartment of the X3 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate, except the chest of the rear dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on chest compression. The X3 scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all critical body areas. The X4 also provided good protection to all critical body regions in this test. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection, while that of other body areas was good. In the pole test of the X4, protection of all critical parts of the body was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused, with collisions avoided at all test speeds.