-
Plus d'info
![]()
88% -
Plus d'info
![]()
78% -
Plus d'info
![]()
61% -
Plus d'info
![]()
83%
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
Conducteur
Siège avant
Voiture
Poteau
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Passager
latéral
Centre
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en optionIn the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward facing restraint, was not excessive. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of contact with parts of the car's interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled by means of a switch, allowing a rearward facing child restraint to be used in the passenger seat. However, labelling of the switch positions was not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded. There were clear warnings of the dangers of using a reaward facing restraint in that seating position without having deactivated the airbag.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Choc à la tête 12.5 Pts
Choc au bassin 3.5 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6 Pts
The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians and the car scored maximum points in this area. The front edge of the bonnet was at best marginal in the protection offered to pedestrians. In most areas where a child's head might strike, the bonnet provided good protection but was predominantly poor in those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
| Nom du système | ESP | |
| Performances | ||
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.00 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Taux d'embardée du véhicule à COS + 1.75 s | 0% | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| Déplacement latéral à BOS + 1.07 s | 3.07 m | Répond aux exigences de la CEE |
| S'applique à | Front seats | ||
| Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
| Visuelle | |
|
 |
| Sonore | |
|
|
|
|||
ÉchoueElectronic stability control is standard equipment on the 208 and met Euro NCAP's requirements. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the driver and front passenger seats. A driver-set speed limitation device is also standard equipment.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Peugeot 208, 1.4 diesel 'Active', LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2012
Poids en ordre de marche 1088kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all 208 of the specification tested
Catégorie Citadine
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
![]()
Monté sur le véhicule de série![]()
Monté sur le véhicule en option![]()
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option![]()
Non disponible![]()
Non applicable
Monté sur le véhicule en optionVidéos
Validité de la notation
Révisions annuelles et nouvelles versions
Partager
The passenger compartment of the 208 remained stable in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Peugeot showed that a similar level of protection would be provided for occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good. In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was marginal. The seat and head restraint provided marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.