Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
bébés jusqu'à 13 kg
-
bébés et jeunes enfants jusqu'à 18 kg
-
Jeunes enfants de 9 à 18 kg
-
Petits enfants de plus de 18 kg
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | |||
---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | ||
Passager | Gauche | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |||
BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |||
Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
The Ypsilon scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ and 3 year dummies in the full-scale crash tests. Both child dummies were sat in rearward-facing restraints. In the side barrier impact, both were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the lieklihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear and the system was not rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Ypsilon is designed could be correctly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 14,9 Pts
Choc au bassin 2,4 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection provided to pedestrians' legs, with good results at all test locations. Protection of the pelvic region was more mixed, results ranging from poor to good. Test results on the bonnet surface showed predominantly adequate or marginal protection for the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded both along the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
S'applique à | Front seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
|
The Ypsilon has electronic stability control as standard, together with a seatbelt reminder for the front seats. A reminder system for the rear seats is available as an option, so it did not qualify for assessment. The Ypsilon does not have autonomos emergency braking, speed assistance or a lane assistance system.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Lancia New Ypsilon 1.2 Gold, LHD
Type de carrosserie - 5 door hatchback
Année de production 2015
Poids en ordre de marche 965kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all Ypsilons of the specification tested
Catégorie Citadine
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur le véhicule en option
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation












Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the Ypsilon remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Lancia showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full width rigid barrier test, no points were scored. For the driver, parameters relating to head injury and neck bending indicated poor protection for both of these parts of the body, and marginal protection of the chest. Protection of the rear passenger dummy was poor for all critical body areas except the neck, protection of which was rated as weak. However, in the side impact barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good, and maximum points were scored. A side pole test was not performed in this assessment. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection for the occupants of those seating positions. The Ypsilon does not have an autonomous emergency braking system to provide additional whiplash protection.
Note: Moments after the offset frontal barrier test, a fire started in the engine compartment, a consequence of the battery positive terminal shorting out and setting fire to brake fluid leaking from the reservoir. This is a rare occurrence: Lancia had not seen this phenomenon in any of their development tests and are not aware of any real-world cases. Nevertheless, the company has investigated the issue and are introducing a countermeasure into production in early December.