Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre








-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à gauche
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Pas de décalage
-
A l’approche d’une voiture à l'arrêt: Décalage à droite
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In the frontal offset test, protection was good or adequate for both the 6 and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, protection was good for all critical body areas. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing passenger to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the C5 Aircross is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 13,7 Pts
Choc au bassin 6,0 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Safety+ Pack | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 10 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate on the bonnet surface but was poor along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. Protection of pedestrians' legs and of the pelvis was good at all test locations and maximum points were scored. As standard, the C5 Aircross has a camera-only AEB system which can detect and respond to pedestrians. The camera + radar system included with the optional safety pack can also detect cyclists. In pedestrian tests, the system performed marginally, with some collisions avoided and some mitigated. In cyclist tests, the system performance was adequate.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Speed Limiter with Speed Limit Recognition |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera based |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Not available | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Lane Keeping Assist |
Type | LKA (including LDW) and ELK |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 65 km/h |
Performances | |
Système de maintien d’urgence dans la voie | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Safety+ Pack | |||
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 5 km/h |
The C5 Aircross has a seatbelt reminder system as standard for the front and rear seats. A camera-based speed assistance system is also standard. Local speed limits are identified and the information is provided to the driver, who can set the speed limiter appropriately. A lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane and can also assist in some more critical situations. The camera + radar AEB system which is part of the optional safety pack demonstrated adequate performance when tested at highway speeds, an improvement on the marginal performance shown by the standard camera-only system.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé Citroen C5 Aircross 1,5l Hdi Live
Nom du pack sécurité Safety+ Pack
Type de carrosserie - 5 door SUV
Année de production 2019
Poids en ordre de marche 1495kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - C5 Aircross with optional safety pack
Catégorie Petit SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the C5 Aircross remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knee and femurs of the driver and dummy. Citroën showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Readings in the tibia indicated weak protection of the lower leg for the driver but all other body regions were protected well or adequately. In the full-width, rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good or adequate for all critical body areas. For the rear passenger dummy, head deceleration indicated marginal protection. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good and the car scored maximum points. In the more severe side pole test, rib compressions indicated marginal protection for the chest. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur.