- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation
Vous trouverez plus d’informations dans l’onglet Validité de la notation
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Plus d'info
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre


Passager
latéral
Centre
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Véhicule testé non équipé mais disponible en option
Non disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Système de retenue pour enfant à dispositif universel d'ancrage
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
Position de siège | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Avant | 2e rangée | |||
Passager | Gauche | Centre | Droite | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Installation sans problème
installation avec précaution
problème critique de sécurité
installation non autorisée
In both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the CHERY OMODA5 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre

Choc à la tête 15,3 Pts
Choc au bassin 1,4 Pts
Choc aux jambes 6,0 Pts
Nom du système | Automatic Emergency Braking System | |||
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 4 km/h | |||
Performances | | ||||
Fonction de freinage automatique |
-
Cycliste du côté passager, vue obstruée
-
Cycliste traversant la route
-
Cycliste le long de la route
Protection of the head was predominantly good or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars and at the base of the windscreen. The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians’ legs but protection of the pelvis was mostly poor. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the CHERY can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed well in tests of its response to pedestrians and in tests of its response to cyclists, with collisions avoided in most cases.
- Bon
- Satisfaisant
- Moyen
- Faible
- Médiocre
Nom du système | Speed limit recognition |
Fonction d'information de limitation de vitesse | Camera and Map |
Fonction de contrôle de vitesse | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
S'applique à | Front and rear seats | ||
Alerte | Siège conducteur | passager(s) avant | passager(s) arrière |
Visuelle | |||
Sonore | |||
Détection des occupants | |||
|
Nom du système | Driver Monitoring System |
Type | Direct eye monitoring |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 10 km/h |
Nom du système | LDW/LDP/ELK |
Type | LKA and ELK |
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 60 km/h |
Performances | |
Système de maintien d’urgence dans la voie | |
Assistance au maintien sur la voie | |
Interface Homme-Machine |
Nom du système | Automatic emergency braking system | |||
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning | |||
Opérationnel à compter de/du | 4 km/h | |||
Capteur utilisé | camera and radar |
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the CHERY OMODA5 performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system uses a camera and digital mapping to determine the local speed limit. This information is provided to the driver, who can choose to let the car adapt the limiter as appropriate.
- Caractéristiques
- Équipement de sécurité
- Vidéos
- Validité de la notation
Caractéristiques
Modèle testé CHERY OMODA5 1.6T, LHD
Type de carrosserie - SUV
Année de production 2022
Poids en ordre de marche 1423kg
NIV à partir duquel la notation s'applique - all OMODA5
Catégorie Petit SUV
Équipement de sécurité
Remarque : d'autres équipements peuvent être disponibles sur le véhicule mais n'ont pas été pris en compte dans l'année de test.
Monté sur le véhicule de série
Monté sur la voiture en tant qu'élément du pack sécurité
Pas monté sur le véhicule test mais disponible en tant qu'option ou élément du pack sécurité
Non disponible
Non applicable
Vidéos
Validité de la notation
Variantes de la gamme de modèles
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 1.6T | LUX | 4 x 2 * | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Pour plus d’informations, veuillez consulter la section Commentaires généraux de l’évaluation

The passenger compartment of the CHERY OMODA5 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. However, CHERY were unable to demonstrate that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes or those sitting in different positions, and protection of this body area was rated as marginal. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate, for the small female dummies used both in the driver’s seat and in the rear passenger position. In the side barrier test, dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body areas. However, the curtain airbag did not deploy as intended and penalty was applied to the score for the head. In the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection of that part of the body. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was adequate. The OMODA5 has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system performed well in Euro NCAP’s tests, with good protection of the occupants’ heads. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The CHERY OMODA5 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash and the ‘MCB’ system applies the brakes to prevent secondary collisions.