Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
Más información
![]()
89% -
Más información
![]()
81% -
Más información
![]()
74% -
Más información
![]()
71%
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Acompañante
Conductor
Acompañantes traseros
Conductor
Vehículo
Mástil
Asiento trasero
Asiento delantero
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
![]()
Instalado en el vehículo de serie![]()
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción![]()
No disponible
-
bebés de hasta 13 kg
-
bebés y niños pequeños de hasta 18 kg
-
niños pequeños de entre 9 y 18 kg
-
Niños de más de 18 kg
![]()
Instale sin problemas![]()
instale con cuidado![]()
problema grave para la seguridad![]()
instalación no permitida
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad| Posición del asiento | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
| Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King Plus (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Pearl & Familyfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Instale sin problemas![]()
instale con cuidado![]()
problema grave para la seguridad![]()
instalación no permitida
The Kadjar scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy in the frontal offset and side barrier tests. Protection of the 3 year dummy was also good apart from marginally high tensile forces in the neck. In the frontal test, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive and, in the side impact, both dummies were properly contained within the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the likelihood of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the vehicle is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car. Cars before VIN VF1RFE00X53586729 have a very slightly different rear seat cushion and position of the seatbelt buckles.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Impacto en cabeza 15,2 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 5,8 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
The bumper provided good protection for pedestrians’ legs and scored maximum points. Protection of the pelvis was at least adequate in all areas tested. The bonnet provided head protection that was predominantly adequate, with good protection towards the centre of the bonnet surface and poor results only at the stiff windscreen pillars.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
| Función de información de limitación de velocidad | Camera based |
| Función de advertencia | System advised |
| Función de limitación de velocidad | System advised |
| Nombre del sistema | BOSCH 9.0 | |
| Comportamiento | ||
| Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.00 s | 4900% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
| Guiñada del vehículo @ COS + 1.75 s | 4900% | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
| Desplazamiento lateral @ BOS + 1.07 s | 3.1 m | cumple los requisitos de ECE |
| Se aplica a | All seats | ||
| Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| Tipo | Lane Departure Warning |
| Operativo a partir de | 65 km/h |
| Advertencia | Audible |
| Comportamiento | |
|
Prueba de confirmación de LDW
|
Pass |
Electronic stability control is standard equipment, together with a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. An autonomous emergency braking system is not standard and the option is not expected to be fitted to most of the cars sold, so its high-speed performance was not assessed. A speed assistance system is available as an option and is expected to be widely fitted. The system uses a camera to inform the driver of local speed limits and the driver can manually set the system appropriately. A lane departure warning system will also be fitted to most cars sold so it was included in the assessment.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado Renault Kadjar 1.5dCi 'ZEN', LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door hatchback
Año de fabricación 2015
Peso en vacío 1420kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - VF1RFE00X53586729
Clase SUV pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
![]()
Instalado en el vehículo de serie![]()
Instalado en el vehículo como opción![]()
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción![]()
No disponible![]()
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Compartir
The passenger compartment of the Kadjar remained stable in the frontal offset test. The driver dummy scores maximum points, with good protection of all body critical regions and the passenger dummy lost only a fraction of a point, with adequate chest protection. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width frontal test, the driver dummy again scored maximum points. The rear passenger dummy had a marginal level of chest protection but all other critical body areas were well protected. The Kadjar provided good protection to all body regions in the side impact barrier test, simulating another car striking the side of the vehicle, and also in the more sever side pole test. The front seats and head restraints provided marginal protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision, while a geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection. An autonomous emergency braking system is available but it is not standard equipment so its low-speed whiplash protection was not assessed.