- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
Obtenga más información en la pestaña Validez de las valoraciones de la evaluación
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Más información
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente








- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente


Acompañante
exterior
Parte central
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
No tenía el vehículo en prueba, pero disponible como opción
No disponible
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
CRS abrochado universal
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
Posición del asiento | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parte delantera | Segunda fila | |||
Acompañante | Lado izquierdo | Parte central | Lado derecho | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Instale sin problemas
instale con cuidado
problema grave para la seguridad
instalación no permitida
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on readings of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical body areas, and was the same in the repeat test of the X4. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente

Impacto en cabeza 19,5 Ptos
Impacto en pelvis 0,0 Ptos
Impacto en piernas 6,0 Ptos
Nombre del sistema | Person warning with City light braking function | |||
Tipo | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Operativo a partir de | 5 km/h | |||
Información adicional | Defaults on for every journey; operates in low ambient light | |||
Prevención | Mitigación | |||
Adulto corriendo y cruzando desde lejos
|
Colisión evitada hasta los 35 km/h | Colisión mitigada hasta los 60 km/h | ||
Adulto andando y cruzando desde cerca (-25%)
|
Colisión evitada hasta los 35 km/h | Colisión mitigada hasta los 60 km/h | ||
Adulto andando y cruzando desde cerca (-75%)
|
Colisión evitada hasta los 25 km/h | Colisión mitigada hasta los 45 km/h | ||
Niño que sale corriendo de vehículos posteriores estacionados
|
Colisión evitada hasta los 25 km/h | Colisión mitigada hasta los 45 km/h |
The X3 and X4 have an 'active', deployable bonnet. Sensors detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to provide greater clearance to the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system worked robustly for different pedestrian statures and across a wide range of speeds. Accordingly, the car was tested with the bonnet in the raised position. Test results were good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs was good at all test locations. However, the protection provided to the pelvis was poor at all locations. In tests of its pedestrian detection, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately, with collisions avoided or mitigated in several test scenarios and speeds.
- Bueno
- Adecuado
- Bajo
- Pobre
- Deficiente
Nombre del sistema | Manual Speed Limiter |
Función de información de limitación de velocidad | N/A |
Función de advertencia | Manually set |
Función de limitación de velocidad | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Se aplica a | All seats | ||
Advertencia | Asiento del conductor | acompañante delantero | acompañantes traseros |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
|
Nombre del sistema | Front-end collision warning with light braking function | |||
Tipo | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
Operativo a partir de | 5 km/h | |||
Información adicional | Default On | |||
Comportamiento | | ||||
Solo función de frenado automático | el conductor reacciona a la advertencia | |||
Velocidad operativa | 5-85 km/h | 5-250 km/h | ||
aproximación a un vehículo parado | Ver Sistema AEB para ciudad | Colisión evitada hasta 65 km/h.Velocidad de colisión reducida hasta 80 km/h. | ||
aproximación a un vehículo más lento | Colisión evitada hasta 70 km/h. | Colisión evitada hasta 80 km/h. | ||
Seguir un vehículo a corta distancia | ||||
el vehículo delantero frena con suavidad | Prevención | Prevención | ||
el vehículo delantero frena con brusquedad | Mitigación | Mitigación | ||
Seguir un vehículo a larga distancia | ||||
el vehículo delantero frena con suavidad | Prevención | Prevención | ||
el vehículo delantero frena con brusquedad | Prevención | Prevención |
The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds, with collisions avoided or mitigated in all scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats, as is a driver-set speed limiter.
- Especificaciones
- Equipamiento de seguridad
- Vídeos
- Validez de la valoración
Especificaciones
Modelo evaluado BMW X3 2.0d, LHD
Tipo de carrocería - 5 door SUV
Año de fabricación 2017
Peso en vacío 1825kg
VIN a partir del cual se aplica la valoración - all X3s and X4s
Clase SUV pequeño
Equipamiento de seguridad
Nota: puede haber otro equipamiento en el vehículo, pero no se tuvo en cuenta en el año de prueba.
Instalado en el vehículo de serie
Disponible en el vehículo como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible en el vehículo de prueba pero sí como equipamiento opcional o como parte del paquete de seguridad
No disponible
No aplicable
Vídeos
Validez de la valoración
Variante de la gama de modelos
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X3 xDrive20d* | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X3 xDrive30i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X3 sDrive20i | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X3 xDrive20i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X3 xDrive30d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X3 M40i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X3 sDrive18d | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X3 M40d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | battery electric | iX3 | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X4 xDrive20i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X4 xDrive30i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X4 M40i | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X4 xDrive20d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 2.5 diesel | X4 xDrive25d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X4 xDrive30d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X4 M40d | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant








Obtenga más información en la sección Comentarios generales de la evaluación
The BMW X4 shares a platform with the BMW X3, tested in 2017, and many tests from that assessment are valid for the X4. However, the side structure is different so additional side impact tests have been done to verify that the performance of the X4 is at least as good as the X3. Those tests showed performance that was at least as good as the X3 so the 2017 star rating of the BMW X3 can be considered valid also for the X4.

The passenger compartment of the X3 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate, except the chest of the rear dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on chest compression. The X3 scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all critical body areas. The X4 also provided good protection to all critical body regions in this test. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection, while that of other body areas was good. In the pole test of the X4, protection of all critical parts of the body was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused, with collisions avoided at all test speeds.