- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte der Registerkarte „Bewertungsgültigkeit“ der Bewertung
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht








-
Annähern an stehendes Fahrzeug: Links versetzt
-
Annähern an stehendes Fahrzeug: Nicht versetzt
-
Annähern an stehendes Fahrzeug: Rechts versetzt
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


Beifahrer
außen
Mitte
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich
Nicht verfügbar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Mit Sicherheitsgurt befestigter Kindersitz
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
Sitzposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Vorne | 2. Sitzreihe | |||
Beifahrer | Links | Mitte | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
In the frontal offset test, protection of both the 6 and 10 year dummies was good or adequate for all critical body areas. In the side barrier test, protection was good for both dummies and the car scored maximum points for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag is automatically disabled when a rearward-facing child restraint is put in that seating position. Tests showed that the system worked robustly and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the EQA is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht

Kopfaufprall 20,3 Punkte
Beckenaufprall 1,4 Punkte
Beinaufprall 6,0 Punkte
Systembezeichnung | Active Brake Assist | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 7 km/h | |||
Leistung | | ||||
Bremsautomatik |
-
Kreuzender Radfahrer
-
Radfahrer entlang Straßenrand
Unlike the B-Class, the EQA has an 'active' bonnet. Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to create more space to the stiff structures in the engine compartment. Mercedes-Benz demonstrated that the system worked robustly for different pedestrian statures and over a range of speeds. Accordingly, tests were performed with the bonnet in the raised 'deployed' position. Test results demonstrate good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian over almost all of the bonnet surface. Protection of pedestrians' legs was good at all test locations but protection of the pelvis was poor. The AEB system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well other cars. Tests of the system's response to pedestrian demonstrated good performance. The EQA scored maximum points in tests of its detection of cyclists.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Systembezeichnung | Speed Limit Assist |
Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungs-Hinweisfunktion | Camera based |
Tempomatik | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gilt für | All Seats | ||
Warnung | Fahrersitz | Beifahrer | Rücksitzinsassen |
Visuell | |||
Akustisch | |||
Insassenerkennung | |||
|
Systembezeichnung | Active Lane Keeping Assist |
Typ | ELK + LKA |
Verfügbar ab | 60 km/h |
Leistung | |
Notfall-Spurhalteassistent | |
Spurhalteassistent | |
Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle |
Systembezeichnung | Active Brake Assist | |||
Typ | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 7 km/h |
The EQA has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. The standard-fit AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles at highway speeds. A camera-based speed limit recognition system advises the driver of the local limit, and allows easy activation of the speed limiter. A lane support system helps the driver to avoid inadvertent drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations.
- Technische Daten
- Sicherheitsausrüstung
- Videos
- Bewertungsgültigkeit
Technische Daten
Getestete Modelle Mercedes-EQ EQA 'AMG Line', LHD
Karosserietyp - 5 door SUV
Baujahr 2019
Leergewicht 2040kg
VIN (Fahrgestellnr.), ab der Bewertung gilt - all EQAs
Klasse Kompakt-SUV
Sicherheitsausrüstung
Hinweis: Andere Ausrüstungen werden zwar für das Fahrzeug evtl. angeboten, wurden jedoch im Testjahr nicht berücksichtigt.
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Im Fahrzeug als Teil des Sicherheitspakets
Im Testfahrzeug nicht vorhanden, aber als Option oder als Teil des Sicherheitspakets verfügbar
Nicht verfügbar
Nicht anwendbar
Videos
Bewertungsgültigkeit
Baureihenvarianten
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
5 door SUV | electric | EQA 250* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | electric | EQA 300 4MATIC | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door SUV | electric | EQA 350 4MATIC | 4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung
The Mercedes-EQ EQA shares much of its structure with the Mercedes-Benz B-Class tested in 2019. Additional tests have been performed where necessary but some tests have been carried over, so the EQA carries a 2019 rating, as does the B-Class.

In the frontal offset test, the passenger compartment of the EQA remained stable. Protection of both the driver and front passenger was good for all critical body areas. Mercedes-Benz showed that a similar level of knee, femur and pelvis protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good or adequate for all critical body areas. For the rear passenger, dummy readings of chest compression indicated marginal protection for that body area but protection was otherwise good or adequate. In both the side barrier impact and the more severe side pole test, protection was good for all body areas and the car scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur.