- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung
Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte der Registerkarte „Bewertungsgültigkeit“ der Bewertung
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Mehr lesen
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht


Beifahrer
außen
Mitte
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich
Nicht verfügbar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Mit Sicherheitsgurt befestigter Kindersitz
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
Sitzposition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Vorne | 2. Sitzreihe | |||
Beifahrer | Links | Mitte | Rechts | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
Britax Römer TriFix2 i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Flex FIX i-Size (i-Size) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Combi X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyFix (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Cybex Solution Z i-Fix (Belt) |
Problemloser Einbau
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem
Einbau nicht zulässig
In both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, good protection was provided to all critical body areas for both child dummies, and the Ranger scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. One i-Size restraint could not be properly installed in the rear outboard seats as access to the top-tether is behind the seat back. Otherwise, all of the child restraint types for which the Ford Ranger is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht

Kopfaufprall 16,3 Punkte
Beckenaufprall 4,4 Punkte
Beinaufprall 5,3 Punkte
Systembezeichnung | Pre-collision Assist with Pedestrian Protection | |||
Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h | |||
Leistung | | ||||
Bremsautomatik |
-
Radfahrer von der zugewandten Seite, mit Sichtbehinderungen
-
Kreuzender Radfahrer
-
Radfahrer entlang Straßenrand
Protection of the head was almost completely good or adequate with some poor results along the front edge of the bonnet. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians’ legs and protection of the pelvis was also mostly good. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Ford can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles. The system performed adequately in tests of its response to pedestrians and well in tests of its response to cyclists, with collisions avoided in most cases.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Systembezeichnung | Speed Limiter |
Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungs-Hinweisfunktion | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Tempomatik | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Gilt für | Front and rear seats | ||
Warnung | Fahrersitz | Beifahrer | Rücksitzinsassen |
Visuell | |||
Akustisch | |||
Insassenerkennung | |||
|
Systembezeichnung | Driver Alert |
Typ | Lane position |
Verfügbar ab | 60 km/h |
Systembezeichnung | Lane-Keeping System |
Typ | LKA and ELK |
Verfügbar ab | 60 km/h |
Leistung | |
Notfall-Spurhalteassistent | |
Spurhalteassistent | |
Mensch-Maschine-Schnittstelle |
Systembezeichnung | Pre-Collision Assist | |||
Typ | Autonomous emergency braking | |||
Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h | |||
Verwendeter Sensor | camera and radar |
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Ford Ranger performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles. A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations. The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit, allowing the limiter to be set appropriately.
- Technische Daten
- Sicherheitsausrüstung
- Videos
- Bewertungsgültigkeit
Technische Daten
Getestete Modelle VW Amarok 2.0/Ford Ranger 3.0
Karosserietyp - Pick-Up
Baujahr 2022
Leergewicht 2434kg
VIN (Fahrgestellnr.), ab der Bewertung gilt - all double cabin Rangers
Klasse Pickup Truck
Sicherheitsausrüstung
Hinweis: Andere Ausrüstungen werden zwar für das Fahrzeug evtl. angeboten, wurden jedoch im Testjahr nicht berücksichtigt.
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig
Im Fahrzeug als Teil des Sicherheitspakets
Im Testfahrzeug nicht vorhanden, aber als Option oder als Teil des Sicherheitspakets verfügbar
Nicht verfügbar
Nicht anwendbar
Videos
Bewertungsgültigkeit
Baureihenvarianten
Body Type | Engine | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | ||||
4 door pick-up | 2.0 diesel Si-T |
Ltd Wildtrak XL XLT |
4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door pick-up | 2.0 diesel Bi-T |
Ltd Wildtrak * |
4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
4 door pick-up | 3.0 diesel |
Platinum Wildtrak |
4 x 4 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant (some tests done on VW Amarok 2.0 Bi-T)


Weitere Informationen entnehmen Sie bitte dem Abschnitt „Allgemeine Kommentare“ der Bewertung
The Ford Ranger and VW Amarok are corporate twins with identical structure and safety equipment. The two vehicles share a common rating, derived from some tests performed on the Ranger by ANCAP and some tests performed by Euro NCAP on the Amarok.

The passenger compartment of the Ford Ranger remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger dummies. Ford demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be an aggressive partner in a frontal collision and it was penalised accordingly. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression but that of the dummy was good for all critical body areas. In both side barrier test, protection was good for all critical body regions and the Ranger scored maximum points in this test. In the more severe side pole impact, chest protection was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was adequate. The Ranger has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system worked well in Euro NCAP’s tests, with good protection of the occupants’ heads. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Ranger does not have an advanced eCall system but is equipped with a system to prevent secondary collisions.