- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
-
Mehr lesen
![]()
93% -
Mehr lesen
![]()
84% -
Mehr lesen
![]()
70% -
Mehr lesen
![]()
58%
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Beifahrer
Fahrer
Rücksitzinsassen
Fahrer
Fahrzeug
Pfeiler
Vordersitz
Rücksitz
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Beifahrer
außen
Mitte
![]()
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig![]()
Nicht mit dem das Testfahrzeug, sondern als Option erhältlich![]()
Nicht verfügbar
-
i-Size
-
ISOFIX
-
Mit Sicherheitsgurt befestigter Kindersitz
![]()
Problemloser Einbau![]()
Einbau mit Vorsicht![]()
Sicherheitskritisches Problem![]()
Einbau nicht zulässig
Einbau mit Vorsicht
Sicherheitskritisches Problem| Sitzposition | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vorne | 2. Sitzreihe | |||
| Beifahrer | Links | Mitte | Rechts | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |
|
||
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
||
| BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
||
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
||
| BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
||
| Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
||
| Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
||
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Problemloser Einbau![]()
Einbau mit Vorsicht![]()
Sicherheitskritisches Problem![]()
Einbau nicht zulässig
In the frontal offset test, protection of the neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on readings of tensile forces. Otherwise, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of both dummies was good for all critical body areas, and was the same in the repeat test of the X4. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the car is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
Kopfaufprall 19.5 Punkte
Beckenaufprall 0 Punkte
Beinaufprall 6 Punkte
| Systembezeichnung | Person warning with City light braking function | |||
| Typ | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
| Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h | |||
| Zusätzliche Informationen | Defaults on for every journey; operates in low ambient light | |||
| Unfallvermeidung | Aufprallmilderung | |||
|
Kreuzender Fußgänger von rechts
|
Unfallvermeidung bis 35 km/h | Aufprallmilderung bis 60 km/h | ||
|
Kreuzender Fußgänger von links -25%
|
Unfallvermeidung bis 35 km/h | Aufprallmilderung bis 60 km/h | ||
|
Kreuzender Fußgänger von links -75%
|
Unfallvermeidung bis 25 km/h | Aufprallmilderung bis 45 km/h | ||
|
Zwischen geparkten Fahrzeugen heraus rennendes Kind
|
Unfallvermeidung bis 25 km/h | Aufprallmilderung bis 45 km/h | ||
The X3 and X4 have an 'active', deployable bonnet. Sensors detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to provide greater clearance to the hard structures in the engine compartment. BMW showed that the system worked robustly for different pedestrian statures and across a wide range of speeds. Accordingly, the car was tested with the bonnet in the raised position. Test results were good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface. The protection provided to pedestrians' legs was good at all test locations. However, the protection provided to the pelvis was poor at all locations. In tests of its pedestrian detection, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately, with collisions avoided or mitigated in several test scenarios and speeds.
- Gut
- Angemessen
- Gering
- Schwach
- Schlecht
| Systembezeichnung | Manual Speed Limiter |
| Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzungs-Hinweisfunktion | N/A |
| Warnfunktion | Manually set |
| Geschwindigkeitsbegrenzer | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Gilt für | All seats | ||
| Warnung | Fahrersitz | Beifahrer | Rücksitzinsassen |
| Visuell | |
|
|
| Akustisch | |
|
|
|
|||
| Systembezeichnung | Front-end collision warning with light braking function | |||
| Typ | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Verfügbar ab | 5 km/h | |||
| Zusätzliche Informationen | Default On | |||
| Leistung | | ||||
| Nur Bremsautomatik | Fahrer reagiert auf Warnung | |||
| Geschwindigkeitsbereich | 5-85 km/h | 5-250 km/h | ||
| Annähern an stehendes Fahrzeug | Siehe AEB-City-Notbremsassistent | Unfallvermeidung bis zu 65 km/h.IAufprallgeschwindigkeit reduziert bis zu 80 km/h. | ||
| Annähern an langsameren Vordermann | Unfallvermeidung bis zu 70 km/h. | Unfallvermeidung bis zu 80 km/h. | ||
| Folgen eines Fahrzeugs in geringer Entfernung | ||||
| Vordermann bremst leicht | Unfallvermeidung | Unfallvermeidung | ||
| Vordermann bremst abrupt | Aufprallmilderung | Aufprallmilderung | ||
| Folgen eines Fahrzeugs in großer Entfernung | ||||
| Vordermann bremst leicht | Unfallvermeidung | Unfallvermeidung | ||
| Vordermann bremst abrupt | Unfallvermeidung | Unfallvermeidung | ||
The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its functionality at highway speeds, with collisions avoided or mitigated in all scenarios. A seatbelt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats, as is a driver-set speed limiter.
- Technische Daten
- Sicherheitsausrüstung
- Videos
- Jährliche Überarbeitungen und Facelifts
Technische Daten
Getestete Modelle BMW X3 2.0d, LHD
Karosserietyp - 5 door SUV
Baujahr 2017
Leergewicht 1825kg
VIN (Fahrgestellnr.), ab der Bewertung gilt - all X3s and X4s
Klasse Kompakt-SUV
Sicherheitsausrüstung
Hinweis: Andere Ausrüstungen werden zwar für das Fahrzeug evtl. angeboten, wurden jedoch im Testjahr nicht berücksichtigt.
![]()
Ausgestattet mit dem Fahrzeug serienmäßig![]()
Im Fahrzeug als Teil des Sicherheitspakets![]()
Im Testfahrzeug nicht vorhanden, aber als Option oder als Teil des Sicherheitspakets verfügbar![]()
Nicht verfügbar![]()
Nicht anwendbar
Im Fahrzeug als Teil des SicherheitspaketsVideos
Jährliche Überarbeitungen und Facelifts
| Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Model Name/Code | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LHD | RHD | ||||
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X3 xDrive20d* | 4 x 4 |  |
|
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X3 xDrive30i | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X3 sDrive20i | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X3 xDrive20i | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X3 xDrive30d | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X3 M40i | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X3 sDrive18d | 4 x 2 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X3 M40d | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 petrol | X4 xDrive20i | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X4 xDrive30i | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 petrol | X4 M40i | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.0 diesel | X4 xDrive20d | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 2.5 diesel | X4 xDrive25d | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X4 xDrive30d | 4 x 4 | |
|
| 5 door SUV | 3.0 diesel | X4 M40d | 4 x 4 | |
|
* Tested variant
The BMW X4 shares a platform with the BMW X3, tested in 2017, and many tests from that assessment are valid for the X4. However, the side structure is different so additional side impact tests have been done to verify that the performance of the X4 is at least as good as the X3. Those tests showed performance that was at least as good as the X3 so the 2017 star rating of the BMW X3 can be considered valid also for the X4.
Weiterleiten
The passenger compartment of the X3 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. BMW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. All critical body regions of the passenger dummy were well protected in this test. In the full-width rigid barrier impact, protection of both the driver and rear passenger was good or adequate, except the chest of the rear dummy, protection of which was rated as marginal, based on chest compression. The X3 scored maximum points in the side barrier test, with good protection of all critical body areas. The X4 also provided good protection to all critical body regions in this test. In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection, while that of other body areas was good. In the pole test of the X4, protection of all critical parts of the body was good. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The autonomous emergency braking system scored maximum points in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries are caused, with collisions avoided at all test speeds.