
The passenger compartment of the RAV4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier test, dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body areas. The same was true of the more severe side pole test, but the curtain airbag caught on part of the interior trim and was judged not to have deployed correctly. As a result, protection of the head was down-graded from good to adequate in both the side impact tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system scored full points in tests of its functionality at low speeds, typical of city driving, with collisions avoided in all scenarios.
In the frontal offset test, protection was good or adequate for all critical body areas of both the 6 and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, maximum points were scored with all body regions well protected. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to e used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the RAV4 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over almost the entire surface. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations, and maximum points were also scored for protection of the pelvis. The AEB system of the RAV4 can detect vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles, and performed well in tests of its reaction to pedestrians and to cyclists.
The RAV4 has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats as standard. The speed assistance system uses a camera to determine the local speed limit. The limit is presented to the driver and offers the opportunity to set the limiter to the speed shown. The lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. In tests of its functionality at highway speeds, the AEB system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in almost all scenarios.
The passenger compartment of the RAV4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier test, dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body areas. The same was true of the more severe side pole test, but the curtain airbag caught on part of the interior trim and was judged not to have deployed correctly. As a result, protection of the head was down-graded from good to adequate in both the side impact tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system scored full points in tests of its functionality at low speeds, typical of city driving, with collisions avoided in all scenarios.
In the frontal offset test, protection was good or adequate for all critical body areas of both the 6 and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, maximum points were scored with all body regions well protected. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to e used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the RAV4 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over almost the entire surface. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations, and maximum points were also scored for protection of the pelvis. The AEB system of the RAV4 can detect vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles, and performed well in tests of its reaction to pedestrians and to cyclists.
The RAV4 has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats as standard. The speed assistance system uses a camera to determine the local speed limit. The limit is presented to the driver and offers the opportunity to set the limiter to the speed shown. The lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. In tests of its functionality at highway speeds, the AEB system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in almost all scenarios.


The passenger compartment of the RAV4 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier test, dummy readings indicated good protection of all critical body areas. The same was true of the more severe side pole test, but the curtain airbag caught on part of the interior trim and was judged not to have deployed correctly. As a result, protection of the head was down-graded from good to adequate in both the side impact tests. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system scored full points in tests of its functionality at low speeds, typical of city driving, with collisions avoided in all scenarios.
In the frontal offset test, protection was good or adequate for all critical body areas of both the 6 and 10 year dummies. In the side barrier test, maximum points were scored with all body regions well protected. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to e used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the RAV4 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over almost the entire surface. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations, and maximum points were also scored for protection of the pelvis. The AEB system of the RAV4 can detect vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles, and performed well in tests of its reaction to pedestrians and to cyclists.
The RAV4 has a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats as standard. The speed assistance system uses a camera to determine the local speed limit. The limit is presented to the driver and offers the opportunity to set the limiter to the speed shown. The lane support system helps to prevent inadvertent drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations. In tests of its functionality at highway speeds, the AEB system performed well, with collisions avoided or mitigated in almost all scenarios.
| Offset Deformable Barrier | Full Width Rigid Barrier |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Side Mobile Barrier | Side Pole |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Rear Seat | Front Seat |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
Frontal Impact - 15.8 Pts | Lateral Impact - 8 Pts |
|---|---|
![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: TOYOTA KIDFIX XP SICT Restraint for 10 year old child: Booster Cushion | ![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: TOYOTA KIDFIX XP SICT Restraint for 10 year old child: Booster Cushion |
Equipment | Front Passenger | Row 2 Outboard | Row 2 Center | 3rd row outboard |
Isofix | ||||
i-Size | ||||
Integrated CRS |
| i-Size | Isofix |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Seatbelt Attached | Legend |
![]() |
![]()
|
System Name | Pre-Collision System As Part Of Toyota Safety Sense | |
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |
Operational From | 10 km/h | |
Scenario | Day time | Night time |
Adult crossing the road | ||
Child running from behind parked vehicles | ||
Adult along the roadside |
Scenario | Day time |
Approaching a crossing cyclist | |
Approaching a cyclist along the roadside |
System Name | Dynamic Radar Cruise Control with Road Sign Assist as part of Toyota Safety Sense |
Speed Limit Info Function | Camera based |
Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection |
System Name | Lane Departure Alert with steering control as part of Toyota Safety Sense |
System Type | LKA (including LDW) |
Min Speed (Operational From) | 50km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface | |
System Name | Pre-Collision System as part of Toyota Safety Sense |
Type | Autonomous Emergency Braking and Forward Collision Warning |
Operational From | 10 km/h |
Scenario | Autobrake function only | Driver reacts to warning |
Approaching a stationary car | ||
Approaching a slower moving car | ||
Approaching a braking car |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Side Head Airbag | |||
Side Chest Airbag | |||
Side Pelvis Airbag | |||
Centre Airbag |
Passenger | Rear | |
Isofix | ||
i-Size | ||
Integrated Child Seat | ||
Airbag Cut-Off Switch | ||
Child Presence Detection |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Seatbelt Reminder |
Active bonnet | |
AEB vulnerable road users | |
AEB pedestrian - reverse | |
Cyclist dooring prevention | |
AEB motorcyclist | |
AEB car-to-car | |
Speed assistance | |
Lane assist system | |
Fatigue detection | |
Distraction detection |
Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year





Body Type | Variant Description | Drivetrain | Rating Applies LHD | Rating Applies RHD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol hybrid - Toyota RAV4* | 4x4 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol plug-in hybrid - Toyota RAV4 | 4x4 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.0l petrol - Toyota RAV4 | 4x4 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.0l petrol - Toyota RAV4 | 4x2 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol hybrid - Toyota RAV4 | 4x2 |
Body Type | Variant Description | Drivetrain | Rating Applies LHD | Rating Applies RHD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol hybrid - Toyota RAV4* | 4x4 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol plug-in hybrid - Toyota RAV4 | 4x4 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.0l petrol - Toyota RAV4 | 4x4 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.0l petrol - Toyota RAV4 | 4x2 | ||
5 door SUV | 2.5l petrol hybrid - Toyota RAV4 | 4x2 |
Date | Event | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|
2019-05-22 | Rating Published | ||
2020-10-21 | Variant added | ||
2026-01-01 | Rating Expired |