Brand logo

Toyota bZ4X

bZ4X frontal view
7b7b0e0c-60c9-482b-8732-7621779d4e23
a0680d06-dee4-4bd6-aa1e-b3c6f9c8efe0
ff52cb61-60a3-47e8-92ff-8ca6eab9dd0e
e0a8b16d-e949-4b7c-81c3-d0e5e76687e8
08bdbe97-c5c9-4eaa-ad08-50fca6e0dad4
e604ed5f-113c-45a4-87cd-45c0f21034c7
f143b838-6482-42da-9137-69b155de21a5
196bf195-caaf-4000-ba46-c99075782202
c5f2cd7d-2ba9-41e0-971e-cc3c6cc27a4d
2869f6c1-da14-4812-bcfe-5647397bbfcc
Play
2025
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The passenger compartment of the Toyota bz4X remained stable in the frontal offset test.  Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and the front seat passenger. Toyota showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.  Protection was good for all critical body areas of the front passenger.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Toyota bz4X would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision.  In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression, but protection was otherwise good or adequate.  In the side barrier test, the Toyota bz4X provided good protection to all critical body areas and scored maximum points.  In the more severe side pole impact, chest protection was marginal but that of other critical body areas was good.  Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate  The Toyota bz4X has a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts.  The airbag performed well in Euro NCAP’s tests with dummy readings indicating good protection for both the driver and passenger.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.  The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a  system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.  Toyota demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the 6 year dummy was good for all critical body areas and good or adequate for the 10 year dummy.  In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for both the 6 and 10 year dummies.  The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.  The Toyota bz4X is equipped with an indirect 'child presence detection' system, which issues a warning when it recognises that a child or infant may have been left in the car.  Indirect systems are no longer rewarded by Euro NCAP. All of the child restraint types for which the Toyota bz4X is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.

Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was largely good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars and at the base of the screen.  Protection of the pelvis was mostly good. Protection of the femur was largely poor, while that of the knee and tibia was good at all test locations  The autonomous emergency braking system of the Toyota bz4X responds to vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists, as well as to other vehicles.  In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed adequately but it does not react to those to the rear of the car.  The system performed well in tests of its reaction to cyclists including ‘dooring’, where a door is opened into the path of a cyclist approaching from behind.  The system’s response to motorcyclists was good.

Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats.  The car has a direct driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit.  The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.

Tested ModelToyota bZ4X 165kW, FWD, LHD
Body TypeSUV
Kerb Weight1950 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

88%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

85%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

80%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

79%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
5 door SUV
Electric - 252kW AWD
4x4
true
true
5 door SUV
Electric - 125kW FWD
4x2
true
true
5 door SUV
Electric - 165kW FWD*
4x2
true
true
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information