
The passenger compartment of the Model Y remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Tesla showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Model Y would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, the all critical body areas were well protected for the driver and were at least adequately protected for the rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The Model Y has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Model Y has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions.
The Model Y provided good protection to both child dummies in both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, scoring maximum points for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Model Y is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The bonnet provided good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian over almost the whole bonnet area, with weak or poor results at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection offered by the bumper to pedestrians’ legs was good at all test locations, as well protection of the pelvis area. The Tesla Model Y has an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system which can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the system’s response to pedestrians, the system performed well. In tests of the system’s response to cyclists, the Model Y scored maximum points.
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles. The Model Y has a seatbelt reminder for all front and rear seats. Its ‘Collision Avoidance Driver Monitoring’ system uses camera-based direct monitoring to detect a distracted driver and automatically changes the sensitivity of the Forward Collision Warning System to be more reactive. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and intervenes more aggressively in some more critical situations, to avoid road departure. The car uses digital mapping and camera inputs to determine the local speed limit and the driver can opt to let the system limit the maximum speed accordingly.
The passenger compartment of the Model Y remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Tesla showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Model Y would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, the all critical body areas were well protected for the driver and were at least adequately protected for the rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The Model Y has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Model Y has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions.
The Model Y provided good protection to both child dummies in both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, scoring maximum points for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Model Y is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The bonnet provided good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian over almost the whole bonnet area, with weak or poor results at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection offered by the bumper to pedestrians’ legs was good at all test locations, as well protection of the pelvis area. The Tesla Model Y has an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system which can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the system’s response to pedestrians, the system performed well. In tests of the system’s response to cyclists, the Model Y scored maximum points.
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles. The Model Y has a seatbelt reminder for all front and rear seats. Its ‘Collision Avoidance Driver Monitoring’ system uses camera-based direct monitoring to detect a distracted driver and automatically changes the sensitivity of the Forward Collision Warning System to be more reactive. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and intervenes more aggressively in some more critical situations, to avoid road departure. The car uses digital mapping and camera inputs to determine the local speed limit and the driver can opt to let the system limit the maximum speed accordingly.


The passenger compartment of the Model Y remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Tesla showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the front passenger was good for all critical body areas. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Model Y would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, the all critical body areas were well protected for the driver and were at least adequately protected for the rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The Model Y has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Model Y has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also has a system which applies the brakes after an impact, to avoid secondary collisions.
The Model Y provided good protection to both child dummies in both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, scoring maximum points for this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Model Y is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
The bonnet provided good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian over almost the whole bonnet area, with weak or poor results at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection offered by the bumper to pedestrians’ legs was good at all test locations, as well protection of the pelvis area. The Tesla Model Y has an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system which can detect vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. In tests of the system’s response to pedestrians, the system performed well. In tests of the system’s response to cyclists, the Model Y scored maximum points.
The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles. The Model Y has a seatbelt reminder for all front and rear seats. Its ‘Collision Avoidance Driver Monitoring’ system uses camera-based direct monitoring to detect a distracted driver and automatically changes the sensitivity of the Forward Collision Warning System to be more reactive. The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and intervenes more aggressively in some more critical situations, to avoid road departure. The car uses digital mapping and camera inputs to determine the local speed limit and the driver can opt to let the system limit the maximum speed accordingly.
Frontal Impact - 16 Pts | Lateral Impact - 8 Pts |
|---|---|
![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer Kidfix I-Size Restraint for 10 year old child: Peg Perego Viaggio Shuttle | ![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Römer Kidfix I-Size Restraint for 10 year old child: Peg Perego Viaggio Shuttle |
Equipment | Front Passenger | Row 2 Outboard | Row 2 Center | 3rd row outboard |
Isofix | ||||
i-Size | ||||
Integrated CRS |
| i-Size | Isofix |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Seatbelt Attached | Legend |
![]() |
![]()
|
System Name | Collision Avoidance Assist | |
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |
Operational From | 4 km/h | |
Scenario | Day time | Night time |
Car reversing into adult or child | ||
Adult crossing a road into which a car is turning | ||
Adult crossing the road | ||
Child running from behind parked vehicles | ||
Adult along the roadside |
Scenario | Day time |
Approaching cyclist crossing from behind parked vehicles | |
Approaching a crossing cyclist | |
Approaching a cyclist along the roadside |
System Name | Speed Assist |
Speed Limit Info Function | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection |
System Name | Collision Avoidance Driver Monitoring |
Type | Direct eye monitoring & steering input |
Operational From | 4km/h |
System Name | Lane Assist |
System Type | LKA and ELK |
Min Speed (Operational From) | 40km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface | |
System Name | Collision Avoidance Assist |
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning |
Operational From | 8 km/h |
Sensor Used | Camera |
Scenario | Autobrake function only | Driver reacts to warning |
Turning across the path of an oncoming car | ||
Approaching a stationary car | ||
Approaching a slower moving car | ||
Approaching a braking car |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Side Head Airbag | |||
Side Chest Airbag | |||
Side Pelvis Airbag | |||
Centre Airbag |
Passenger | Rear | |
Isofix | ||
i-Size | ||
Integrated Child Seat | ||
Airbag Cut-Off Switch | ||
Child Presence Detection |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Seatbelt Reminder |
Active bonnet | |
AEB vulnerable road users | |
AEB pedestrian - reverse | |
Cyclist dooring prevention | |
AEB motorcyclist | |
AEB car-to-car | |
Speed assistance | |
Lane assist system | |
Fatigue detection | |
Distraction detection |
Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year





Body Type | Variant Description | Drivetrain | Rating Applies LHD | Rating Applies RHD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5 door SUV | Dual Motor Electric - Model Y Performance AWD | 4x4 | ||
5 door SUV | Rear wheel drive electric - Model Y RWD | 4x2 | ||
5 door SUV | Dual Motor Electric - Model Y Long Range AWD* | 4x4 |
Body Type | Variant Description | Drivetrain | Rating Applies LHD | Rating Applies RHD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5 door SUV | Dual Motor Electric - Model Y Performance AWD | 4x4 | ||
5 door SUV | Rear wheel drive electric - Model Y RWD | 4x2 | ||
5 door SUV | Dual Motor Electric - Model Y Long Range AWD* | 4x4 |
Date | Event | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|
2022-09-07 | Rating Published | ||
2023-09-28 | Annual Review | ||
2023-11-30 | Variant added |