Brand logo

smart #5

Best in Class
#5 frontal view
60ef97d1-4dd4-4e39-9653-879bcf98c783
1cf8bf16-cc1b-44ba-b61b-70a7f93d5d00
fb973c44-3ebc-4ca7-8e36-c2de8bd9fadb
1f6e09fe-268c-4a1d-a309-2d03e45f79a2
35c3ed12-5d58-4003-a543-0fd807c1d257
6bf55265-f6e0-4dcd-882b-71f09b0efde5
11bfa8dd-b8c2-4eda-a6f2-581bcfc5725e
3303c188-9b9a-471e-a725-745432f99129
8a612c76-8db9-4458-972a-d020c1a62bee
b633299e-1070-44a6-b1f9-507dbcbbb6f3
Play
2025
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The passenger compartment of the smart #5 remained stable in the frontal offset test.  Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and the front seat passenger. smart showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.  Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the smart #5 would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision.  In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was good for all critical body regions of the driver but that of the rear passenger’s chest was rated as marginal, based on compression.  In the side barrier test, the smart #5 provided good protection to all critical body areas and scored maximum points.  However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak protection for the chest.  Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate  The smart #5 has a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts.  The airbag performed well in Euro NCAP’s tests with dummy readings indicating good protection for both the driver and passenger.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.  The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a  system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.  smart demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.

In both the frontal offset and the side barrier tests protection was good for all critical body areas for the 6 and 10 year dummies, and the smart #5 scored maximum points in this part of the assessment.  The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.  The smart #5 is equipped with a direct 'child presence detection' system, which issues a warning when it detects that a child or infant has been left in the car. All of the child restraint types for which the smart #5 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.

Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was largely good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars and at the base and top of the screen.   Protection of the pelvis was mixed. Protection of the femur was good at all test locations, while that of the knee and tibia was at least adequate.  The autonomous emergency braking system of the smart #5 responds to vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists, as well as to other vehicles.  In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed well.  However, the system does not respond to those to the rear of the car.  The system performed well in tests of its reaction to cyclists, including the ‘dooring’ scenarios, in which a door is opened into the path of a cyclist approaching from behind.  The system’s response to motorcyclists was good.

Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats.  The car has a direct driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue and some types of distraction.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit.  The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.

Tested Modelsmart #5 Pro
Body TypeSUV
Kerb Weight2200 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

88%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

93%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

84%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

92%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
5 door SUV
Battery Electric - Pulse+
4x2
true
true
5 door SUV
Battery Electric - Pro*
4x2
true
true
5 door SUV
Battery Electric - Pro+
4x2
true
true
5 door SUV
Battery Electric - Premium+
4x2
true
true
5 door SUV
Battery Electric - Performance
4x2
true
true
5 door SUV
Battery Electric - Edition
4x2
true
true
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information