Brand logo

Renault Megane E-Tech

Megane E-Tech frontal view
b7cd7dba-2c6e-4bcc-a0cf-5a507f8c2ecc
f655407f-bd91-48c5-8253-494834b54064
ab2b613b-402e-4701-a375-36895787c5ed
f7553286-3c0b-4309-ac7d-3d7dc914c013
2f9543c9-ad82-40fa-9be3-c5ec4f193dff
ed84d0bc-7182-47ad-b295-48efb86f738f
7c8cdd7d-4547-4a70-a828-b9b47f86a176
dadbc378-fd06-4754-b3f3-bd51ddbd8794
4e53face-af92-40d6-84e1-cd30017d8a39
3f5530b7-33cc-44e6-9853-143ffd74f3a9
d4825b8b-6be0-4491-8297-f593599fb3b3
Play
2022
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The passenger compartment of the Megane E-Tech remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Apart from the driver’s chest, protection of which was adequate, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate.   Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Megane E-Tech would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good or adequate protection was provided to all critical body areas, for both the driver and rear passenger. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The Megane E-Tech has a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts and this performed well in Euro NCAP's test. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats indicated good whiplash protection.   The Megane E-Tech has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, but there is no system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.

In the frontal offset test, measurements of neck tension in the 10-year dummy indicated a marginal level of protection.  Otherwise, protection of all critical body areas was good, both for the 10-year and 6-year dummies.  The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.  All of the restraint types for the which the Megane E-Tech is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.

The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with some poor results recorded on the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.  The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test points.  However, protection of the pelvis was mainly weak or poor.  The autonomous emergency braking system, fitted as standard, can detect vulnerable road users as well as other vehicles.  The system performed well in tests of its reaction to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most scenarios.

In tests of its response to other vehicles, the autonomous emergency braking system performed adequately.  A lane support system gently corrects the steering if the car is drifting out of lane and it can also intervene more aggressively in some other, more critical, situations.  The speed assistance system can detect the local speed limit and presents the information to the driver, allowing the speed limiter to be set appropriately.  A seat belt reminder is standard for all seating positions.

Tested ModelMegane E-Tech EV60 220ch 'Techno', LHD
Kerb Weight1636 kg
ClassSmall Family Car
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

85%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

88%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

65%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

79%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information