Brand logo

Renault 4

4 frontal view
c8bde2bc-0bc9-4ed2-b924-bc74575f9c56
0e3b0d1d-f579-465c-9471-c4bd23d8a4d8
ed55618f-68ac-4669-b909-9689f2ace413
934f27c4-2d6a-44d8-a858-2fa26407c14e
675cee72-3076-4a33-ac7d-3bd6a3dcb9ea
85778362-2c15-44b5-ae09-007107ae1b6c
e767a3cc-ea20-4cb6-a919-13154a731478
Play
2024
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is a partner model to the Renault 5 E-Tech Electric tested by Euro NCAP in 2024.  Additional tests have been performed but many are read across from the Renault 5 assessment.

The passenger compartment of the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric remained stable in the frontal offset test.  Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger.  Renault demonstrated that a similar level of protection is provided to occupants of different sizes or those sitting in different positions.  The driver’s chest protection was rated as marginal, based on readings of compression.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the rear passenger’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression.  Otherwise, all critical parts of the body were well or adequately protected for both occupants. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good, and the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection was good or adequate.  Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric does not have a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.   The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.  Renault demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.

In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for the 6 and 10 year dummy, and the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag, and the system was rewarded.  The Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is not equipped with a 'child presence detection' system, to warn when a child may have been left in the car.  All child restraint types for which the Renault 4 E-Tech Electric is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.

Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was predominantly good or adequate, with a few poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.  Protection of the pelvis was mixed, while that of the femur was good at all test locations.  Protection of the knee and tibia was predominantly good.  The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Renault can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles.  The system’s response both to pedestrians was adequate.  A system to protect pedestrians to the rear of the car is an option and was not included in this assessment. The system’s performance in tests of its reaction to cyclists was good but protection against ‘dooring’ (where a door is suddenly opened in the path of a cyclist approaching from behind) is an option and not assessed.  Performance of the AEB system was good in tests of its response to motorcyclists.

Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles, with impacts being avoided in most tests.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats.  The car has an indirect driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue but not distraction.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit.  The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.

Tested ModelRenault 4 E-TECH EV52 Techno, LHD
Kerb Weight1449 kg
ClassSmall Family Car
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

79%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

85%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

73%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

68%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information