Brand logo

Nissan Micra

Micra frontal view
b831ed87-1043-4236-a5d4-3180ea50f24d
e2a79078-9163-483a-981f-0b83f7b11275
718ed9fc-dcf0-4eb6-9cb6-1a49fbe71e9d
19db1f65-13f1-4ad6-ae2c-f052445942f1
cb343554-dd51-48f8-97f8-e77eba4c77b1
eb73015f-401e-4ed1-8ba0-555229db4e31
e73bc46a-4b14-45a7-9d7c-1dc6464e62de
15ebf3cb-4063-412d-a54b-b91228abbec0
5a249343-6d1c-49be-b4ac-a7a21898714f
Play
2024
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The 2025 Nissan Micra is a twin to the Renault 5 assessed by Euro NCAP in 2024.  Additional tests have been performed where small differences might affect pedestrian impact scores but results are otherwise taken from the Renault 5 assessment.

The passenger compartment of the remained stable in the frontal offset test.  Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger.  Nissan were not able to demonstrate that all areas of the dashboard would provide the same level of protection to occupants of different sizes or those sitting in different positions, and the score was penalised.  The driver’s chest protection was rated as marginal, based on readings of compression.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Nissan Micra would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the rear passenger’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression.  Otherwise, all critical parts of the body were well or adequately protected for both occupants. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body regions was good, and the Nissan Micra scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be marginal. The Nissan Micra does not have a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.   The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.  It was demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.

In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good for the 6 and 10 year dummy, apart from the necks of both in the frontal impact, where protection was adequate. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag, and the system was rewarded.  The Nissan Micra is not equipped with a 'child presence detection' system, to warn when a child may have been left in the car.  The rear centre seat could not properly accommodate the child restraints used by Euro NCAP for its assessment but other seating positions met the requirements.

Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was predominantly adequate, with a few poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.  Protection of the pelvis was good at all test locations.  Protection of the pelvis was mostly good, while that of the femur and that of the knee and tibia was good at all test locations.  The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Nissan can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles.  The system’s response both to pedestrians was adequate.  A system to protect pedestrians to the rear of the car is an option and was not included in this assessment. The system’s performance in tests of its reaction to cyclists was good but protection against ‘dooring’ (where a door is suddenly opened in the path of a cyclist approaching from behind) is an option and not assessed.  Performance of the AEB system was good in tests of its response to motorcyclists.

Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles, with impacts being avoided in most tests.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats.  The car has an indirect driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue but not distraction.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit.  The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.

Tested ModelRenault 5 E-TECH electric techno comfort, LHD
Body TypeHatchback
Kerb Weight1449 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

80%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

80%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

77%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

68%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
5 door Hatchback
E-Tech EV40 120 HP - Urban Range 120 HP
4x2
true
true
5 door Hatchback
E-Tech EV52 150 HP - Comfort Range 150 HP*
4x2
true
true
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information