Brand logo

MG MGS9 PHEV

MGS9 PHEV frontal view
2f4f353d-7f0a-4865-8047-177257ca9373
4bf8548b-d733-4b1e-828e-890dda6a73fe
26d8a0dc-0785-413a-b6e8-378ca2ae5488
59736734-57d0-4948-88e2-9045be77678b
d3237d4f-3ac4-4526-b618-39a46bae0a1a
077ebfca-8ba1-416a-9ce1-b347b3191d5a
36075226-4873-471a-9c49-87f3ff3a486b
544d638c-a236-471e-91ee-38c1f1c5cf69
516ac076-4573-406f-bdf1-55384c035d3f
5bebf85e-8b4c-4969-810e-a4367a5ef152
101a9959-6f3a-4508-9fee-2c2e9fa67834
Play
2025
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The passenger compartment of the MG MGS9 PHEV remained stable in the frontal offset test.  Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and front passenger.  However, some structure in the dashboard on the driver’s side were thought to pose a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and those sitting in different positions, and the score was penalised.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the MG MGS9 PHEV would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision.  In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was rated as weak, based on dummy readings of compression.  Protection was otherwise good or adequate.  In the side barrier test, the MG MGS9 PHEV provided good protection to all critical body areas and scored maximum points.  In the more severe side pole impact, protection was at least adequate for all critical body areas.  Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate  The MG MGS9 PHEV has a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts.  The airbag performed well in Euro NCAP’s tests with dummy readings indicating good protection for both the driver and passenger.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  However, a geometric analysis of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.  The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a  system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.  MG demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.

In both the frontal offset and the side barrier tests protection of all critical body areas was good for both the 6 and 10 year dummies, and the MG MGS9 PHEV scored maximum points in this part of the assessment.  The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.  The MG MGS9 PHEV is not equipped with 'child presence detection', a system which can alert others if children have been left in the car. All of the child restraint types for which the MG MGS9 PHEV is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.

Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was generally good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars and at the base of the screen.  Protection of the pelvis was mixed. Protection of the femur was good at all test locations, while that of the knee and tibia was good in places and poor in others.  The autonomous emergency braking system of the MG MGS9 PHEV responds to vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists, as well as to other vehicles.  In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed well, and included protection for those to the rear of the car.  The system also performed well in tests of its reaction to cyclists, including ‘dooring’, where a door is opened into the path of a cyclist approaching from behind.  The system’s response to motorcyclists was good.

Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats.  The car has a direct driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue and some types of distraction.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit.  The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.

Tested ModelMG MGS9 PHEV 'LUX', LHD
Body TypeSUV
Kerb Weight2160 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

84%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

85%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

74%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

77%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
5 door SUV
Petrol GS61H - DEL
4x2
true
true
5 door SUV
Petrol GS61H - LUX*
4x2
true
true
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information