
The passenger compartment of the MX-30 remained stable in the offset frontal test. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Dummy measurements indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mazda demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deformed crush element from the offset frontal test indicated that the MX-30's structure did not pose a high risk to the occupants of a colliding vehicle in a frontal offset impact. In the full-width rigid wall test, protection was good or adequate for all body critical body regions for both the driver and the rear seat passenger. In both the side barrier test, representing a collision by another vehicle, and the more severe side pole impact protection of all critical body areas was good, and the car scored maximum points for these two tests. In an assessment of protection in far-side impact, mitigation of dummy excursion (its movement towards the other side of the vehicle) was rated as adequate. The MX-30 is equipped with a centre airbag to protect against occupant-to-occupant interaction in side impacts. This system worked well in Euro NCAP's test, with good protection of the head for both front seat occupants. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. With regard to post-crash safety, the MX-30 has neither an advanced e-Call system nor multi-collision brake.
In both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate for all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. One child restraint could not be fitted stably in the centre rear seat. Otherwise, the restraints for which the MX-30 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was almost entirely good or adequate. The bumper also provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The MX-30's autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In Euro NCAP's tests, the system's response to such road users was marginal. The system does not detect pedestrians to the rear of the car, nor those crossing the path of a turning vehicle.
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) is fitted as standard. The system performed well in tests of its detection and reaction to other vehicles, with impacts being avoided or mitigated in most cases. The MX-30 has a seatbelt reminder for front and rear seats. In addition, the car has a Driver Attention Alert, a system which monitors steering inputs and issues a warning if fatigued or impaired driving is detected. The lane support system gently corrects the steering of the car if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes much more aggressively in some critical situations. A speed assistance system uses a camera to detect the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver who can confirm that the car is to be limited to that speed.
The passenger compartment of the MX-30 remained stable in the offset frontal test. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Dummy measurements indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mazda demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deformed crush element from the offset frontal test indicated that the MX-30's structure did not pose a high risk to the occupants of a colliding vehicle in a frontal offset impact. In the full-width rigid wall test, protection was good or adequate for all body critical body regions for both the driver and the rear seat passenger. In both the side barrier test, representing a collision by another vehicle, and the more severe side pole impact protection of all critical body areas was good, and the car scored maximum points for these two tests. In an assessment of protection in far-side impact, mitigation of dummy excursion (its movement towards the other side of the vehicle) was rated as adequate. The MX-30 is equipped with a centre airbag to protect against occupant-to-occupant interaction in side impacts. This system worked well in Euro NCAP's test, with good protection of the head for both front seat occupants. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. With regard to post-crash safety, the MX-30 has neither an advanced e-Call system nor multi-collision brake.
In both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate for all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. One child restraint could not be fitted stably in the centre rear seat. Otherwise, the restraints for which the MX-30 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was almost entirely good or adequate. The bumper also provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The MX-30's autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In Euro NCAP's tests, the system's response to such road users was marginal. The system does not detect pedestrians to the rear of the car, nor those crossing the path of a turning vehicle.
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) is fitted as standard. The system performed well in tests of its detection and reaction to other vehicles, with impacts being avoided or mitigated in most cases. The MX-30 has a seatbelt reminder for front and rear seats. In addition, the car has a Driver Attention Alert, a system which monitors steering inputs and issues a warning if fatigued or impaired driving is detected. The lane support system gently corrects the steering of the car if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes much more aggressively in some critical situations. A speed assistance system uses a camera to detect the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver who can confirm that the car is to be limited to that speed.


The passenger compartment of the MX-30 remained stable in the offset frontal test. Protection of the passenger dummy was good for all critical body areas. Dummy measurements indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Mazda demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Analysis of the deformed crush element from the offset frontal test indicated that the MX-30's structure did not pose a high risk to the occupants of a colliding vehicle in a frontal offset impact. In the full-width rigid wall test, protection was good or adequate for all body critical body regions for both the driver and the rear seat passenger. In both the side barrier test, representing a collision by another vehicle, and the more severe side pole impact protection of all critical body areas was good, and the car scored maximum points for these two tests. In an assessment of protection in far-side impact, mitigation of dummy excursion (its movement towards the other side of the vehicle) was rated as adequate. The MX-30 is equipped with a centre airbag to protect against occupant-to-occupant interaction in side impacts. This system worked well in Euro NCAP's test, with good protection of the head for both front seat occupants. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. With regard to post-crash safety, the MX-30 has neither an advanced e-Call system nor multi-collision brake.
In both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate for all critical parts of the body. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. One child restraint could not be fitted stably in the centre rear seat. Otherwise, the restraints for which the MX-30 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was almost entirely good or adequate. The bumper also provided good protection to pedestrians' legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed. The MX-30's autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system can detect vulnerable road users like pedestrians and cyclists, as well as other vehicles. In Euro NCAP's tests, the system's response to such road users was marginal. The system does not detect pedestrians to the rear of the car, nor those crossing the path of a turning vehicle.
Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) is fitted as standard. The system performed well in tests of its detection and reaction to other vehicles, with impacts being avoided or mitigated in most cases. The MX-30 has a seatbelt reminder for front and rear seats. In addition, the car has a Driver Attention Alert, a system which monitors steering inputs and issues a warning if fatigued or impaired driving is detected. The lane support system gently corrects the steering of the car if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes much more aggressively in some critical situations. A speed assistance system uses a camera to detect the local speed limit. This information is presented to the driver who can confirm that the car is to be limited to that speed.
Frontal Impact - 16 Pts | Lateral Impact - 8 Pts |
|---|---|
![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Roemer Kidfix2 R with secureguard Restraint for 10 year old child: Britax Roemer Kidfix2 R (booster cushion only) with secureguard | ![]() Restraint for 6 year old child: Britax Roemer Kidfix2 R with secureguard Restraint for 10 year old child: Britax Roemer Kidfix2 R (booster cushion only) with secureguard |
Equipment | Front Passenger | Row 2 Outboard | Row 2 Center | 3rd row outboard |
Isofix | ||||
i-Size | ||||
Integrated CRS |
| i-Size | Isofix |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Seatbelt Attached | Legend |
![]() |
![]()
|
System Name | Sbs (Smart Brake Support) | |
Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |
Operational From | 10 km/h | |
Scenario | Day time | Night time |
Car reversing into adult or child | ||
Adult crossing a road into which a car is turning | ||
Adult crossing the road | ||
Child running from behind parked vehicles | ||
Adult along the roadside |
Scenario | Day time |
Approaching cyclist crossing from behind parked vehicles | |
Approaching a crossing cyclist | |
Approaching a cyclist along the roadside |
System Name | TSR & ISA |
Speed Limit Info Function | Camera & Map, subsigns supported |
Speed Control Function | System advised (accurate to 5km/h) |
Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
Visual | |||
Audible | |||
Occupant Detection | - |
System Name | Driver Attention Alert (DAA) |
Type | Steering input |
Operational From | 65km/h |
System Name | LDWS(Lane Departure Warning System)/LAS(Lane-keep Assist System)/Emergency Lane Keeping Blind Spot Assist/Emergency Lane Keeping Road Keep Assist |
System Type | LKA and ELK |
Min Speed (Operational From) | 55km/h |
Performance | |
Emergency Lane Keeping | |
Lane Keep Assist | |
Human Machine Interface | |
System Name | SBS (Smart Brake Support) |
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning |
Operational From | 4 km/h |
Sensor Used | Camera and radar |
Scenario | Autobrake function only | Driver reacts to warning |
Turning across the path of an oncoming car | ||
Approaching a stationary car | ||
Approaching a slower moving car | ||
Approaching a braking car |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Front Airbag | |||
Belt Pretensioner | |||
Belt Loadlimiter | |||
Knee Airbag |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Side Head Airbag | |||
Side Chest Airbag | |||
Side Pelvis Airbag | |||
Centre Airbag |
Passenger | Rear | |
Isofix | ||
i-Size | ||
Integrated Child Seat | ||
Airbag Cut-Off Switch | ||
Child Presence Detection |
Driver | Passenger | Rear | |
Seatbelt Reminder |
Active bonnet | |
AEB vulnerable road users | |
AEB pedestrian - reverse | |
Cyclist dooring prevention | |
AEB motorcyclist | |
AEB car-to-car | |
Speed assistance | |
Lane assist system | |
Fatigue detection | |
Distraction detection |
Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year





Body Type | Variant Description | Drivetrain | Rating Applies LHD | Rating Applies RHD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5 door | Electric Motor - Mazda MX-30* | 4x2 | ||
5 door | PHEV - Mazda MX-30 | 4x2 |
Body Type | Variant Description | Drivetrain | Rating Applies LHD | Rating Applies RHD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5 door | Electric Motor - Mazda MX-30* | 4x2 | ||
5 door | PHEV - Mazda MX-30 | 4x2 |
Date | Event | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|
2020-11-12 | Rating Published | ||
2021-11-01 | Annual Review | ||
2022-11-01 | Annual Review | ||
2023-03-01 | Variant added |