Brand logo

Maxus MIFA 9

MIFA 9 frontal view
82b3103e-64ae-406a-a41f-bb7f422add7b
612abd26-31b0-4f93-afba-ff832fc239c4
963e878f-18e2-4eb2-ab49-9f8aeb2a2407
806b2a72-cfce-4229-8de6-e3131d86ec1e
0e008f98-eea3-419d-8790-bade61613714
f8cc6519-8bab-4076-9755-a717cb50abb5
9d229f8b-5802-4d50-9af9-946e378c728d
1f54303d-b9a8-4366-beb7-29e0e2c4101a
2fc28885-a02b-4b33-9c4f-cf5e16613049
d40934d1-094e-4093-a120-79429db9ddf9
9cc18d6c-2353-4887-b620-516ba1d4bc84
Play
2022
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The passenger compartment of the Maxus MIFA 9 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Maxus demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.  For the front passenger, good protection was provided to all critical body areas.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body regions was good for both the driver and rear passenger and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment.  In the side barrier test, all critical parts of the body were well protected.  In the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated a marginal level of protection for the chest, with good protection of other critical areas. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The MIFA 9 has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts.  The system performed well in Euro NCAP’s tests, with good protection of the occupants’ heads.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.   The MIFA 9 has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash but it lacks a system to prevent secondary collisions.

In both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body regions was good for both child dummies, and the MIFA 9 scored maximum points in this part of the assessment.  The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.  All of the child restraint types for which the MIFA 9 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.

Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate over the bonnet surface but poor results were recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.  The bumper offered good or adequate protection to pedestrians’ legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed.  The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Maxus can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles.  The system performed well in tests of its response to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided in most cases.

The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the MIFA 9 performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats and the car is equipped with a system to detect driver fatigue.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit, and the driver can choose to let the car adjust the speed limiter accordingly.  However, the speed limit recognition function did not meet Euro NCAP’s requirements and the car scored only for its speed limiter.

Tested ModelMaxus MIFA 9, LHD
Body TypeMPV
Kerb Weight2410 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

93%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

89%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

73%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

83%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
5 door MPV
Electric - Ultimate
4x2
true
true
5 door MPV
Electric - Luxury*
4x2
true
true
5 door MPV
Electric - Elite
4x2
true
true
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information