Brand logo

Lynk & Co 2

2 frontal view
fde1b5ac-6629-4a65-a40e-e1dac13d0eb6
eea9e49b-b7bf-4ba3-9a1f-4c1dd028c288
c3eb1bdd-0416-4605-93e2-688fa8c037f1
f8522fea-3391-41ef-bae6-2ef62dbc2b75
b63b4cf1-dfdb-4391-affc-219c118a0980
bc5bdfda-954a-4491-9f9e-0704c6e1df35
a7957919-f016-4034-915a-7c225388c9f6
075a5d0c-d5b5-419f-a466-56dcb1ddcf61
1ed175ae-ca71-4ac2-b834-21eff04cd2b5
c52a2650-4ce3-4909-b855-1d18c98d0e1d
b96b6011-57ed-4e89-9b13-f3658ca3d717
Play
2025
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The passenger compartment of the Lynk & Co 02 remained stable in the frontal offset test.  Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and the front seat passenger. Lynk & Co showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Lynk & Co 02 would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision.  In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was good for all critical body regions of both the driver and the rear seat passenger.    In the side barrier test, the Lynk & Co 02 provided good protection to all critical body areas and scored maximum points.  In the more severe side pole impact, protection was at least adequate for all critical body areas.  Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate  The Lynk & Co 02 has a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts.  The airbag performed well in Euro NCAP’s tests with dummy readings indicating good protection for both the driver and passenger.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.   The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a  system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.  Lynk & Co demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.

In both the frontal offset and the side barrier tests, protection was good for all critical body areas, for the 6 and 10 year dummies, and the Lynk & Co 02 scored maximum points in this part of the assessment.    The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.    The Lynk & Co 02 is not equipped with 'Child Presence Detection', a system which can alert others if children have been left in the car, is available as an option on the Lynk & Co 02, but was not included in this assessment. The largest i-Size child restraint could not be properly installed in the front passenger seat, as the seat foam interfered with insertion of the ISOFIX probes.  Otherwise, all restrains could be properly installed and accommodated.

Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was largely good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars and at the base and top of the screen.   Protection of the pelvis was good at all test locations. Protection of the femur was mixed, while that of the knee and tibia was good at all test locations  The autonomous emergency braking system of the Lynk & Co 02 responds to vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists, as well as to other vehicles.  In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed well.  The system performed well in tests of its reaction to cyclists, while its response to motorcyclists was good.

Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats.    The car has a direct driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue and some types of distraction.    The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit.  The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.

Tested ModelLnyk&Co 02 Ultra, LHD
Body TypeSUV
Kerb Weight1820 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

90%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

87%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

83%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

89%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
5 door SUV
Electric - Pro
4x2
true
true
5 door SUV
Electric - Halo*
4x2
true
true
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information