Brand logo

Honda Civic

Civic frontal view
aa9e244c-e424-4c67-8a9c-9459be9973e2
4fd55c6f-1cd9-42cc-901b-dda393632f5a
6a50c569-ca01-438b-bca9-98fbf9155d1d
5ee36058-256d-4071-b4ba-e66a7aaa480a
eafbc849-afb2-4798-b1f0-c6c7949b52bc
ead5be0f-7496-4ef2-ace0-86eca355471b
1c440ac2-8d73-4f57-a8ee-189eb4d8e25c
61bffae0-91ba-45d3-83bb-f09b3dab1557
7e527a61-72ad-4bfa-b809-74fa9eaa4a80
793b3198-5881-46ee-9679-d30235cfc809
Play
2022
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The passenger compartment of the Civic remained stable in the frontal offset test. Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as weak, based on dummy readings of compression.  However, dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger.  Honda demonstrated that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the Civic would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate both for the driver and the rear seat passenger. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate. The Civic has a counter-measure to mitigate against occupant to occupant injuries in such impacts. The system performed well in Euro NCAP’s test, with good protection of occupants’ heads.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.   The Civic has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash but it lacks a system to prevent secondary collisions in the event of an accident.

The Civic provided good protection for all critical body regions of both the 6 and 10 year dummies in the frontal offset and side barrier tests, and scored maximum points in this part of the assessment.  The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. All of the restraint types for which the Civic is designed could be properly installed and accommodated.

The Civic has an ‘active’ bonnet.  Sensors in the bumper detect when a pedestrian has been struck and actuators lift the bonnet to create more space to the hard structures in the engine compartment.  Honda showed that the system worked robustly for different pedestrian statures and across a range of speeds and the car was tests with the bonnet in the raised ‘deployed’ position.  Protection of the head of struck pedestrian was almost entirely good or adequate.  The bumper offered good protection to pedestrians’ legs but protection of the pelvis region was mixed.  The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Civic can respond to vulnerable road users as well as to other vehicles.  The system performed well in tests of its response to pedestrians and cyclists, with collisions avoided in most scenarios.

The Civic’s autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats but the car does not have a system to detect driver fatigue.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane, and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  A speed assistance system detects the local speed limit and the driver can choose to set the limiter or let the system do so automatically.

Tested ModelHonda Civic 2.0 hybrid 'Sport', LHD
Body TypeHatchback
Kerb Weight1458 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

89%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

87%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

82%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

83%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
5 door Hatchback
2.0 petrol hybrid - Elegance
4x2
true
true
5 door Hatchback
2.0 petrol hybrid - Sport*
4x2
true
true
5 door Hatchback
2.0 petrol hybrid - Advance
4x2
true
true
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information