Brand logo

EBRO s400

s400 frontal view
1668dce9-0fe2-4cae-b6ee-4af681e5b216
cd0fe372-5207-4956-b58b-ed43c55ec1c8
b60b73e7-6b31-45e3-b864-28a84bc3833a
2c609890-e213-499c-ba8c-9965019f90b0
97e48917-6a38-4b47-b653-ea5fab0aabc7
c2c5e55c-ce61-4ae6-81b6-652a3ce670b8
19aa6fbf-3699-4111-a7ca-aa91abf7cbf6
752e8f63-d2ec-497c-b7ce-45a2fec5eb96
1eb98932-bf36-44c3-9cca-65978bcd55d7
01ff7f2c-e693-427e-a6e7-411d3d617dc8
5a8ae15f-335f-4b1a-91bf-20078762268f
Play
2025
Standard
Standard

Verdict

The passenger compartment of the EBRO s400 remained stable in the frontal offset test.  Dummy readings indicated good or adequate protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger.  However, some values exceeded the threshold at which EBRO could demonstrate similar protection for other occupants, and a penalty was applied.  Protection of the driver’s chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression.  Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the EBRO s400 would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision.  In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver’s chest was rated as weak, based on dummy readings of compression, and that of the neck was poor, based on bending moments. Protection was good for all critical body areas of the rear passenger.  In the side barrier test the EBRO s400 provided good protection to all critical body areas and scored maximum points.  In the more severe side pole impact, protection was at least adequate for all critical body areas.  Control of excursion (the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the vehicle when it is hit from the far side) was found to be adequate  The EBRO s400 has a countermeasure to mitigate against occupant-to-occupant injuries in such impacts.  The airbag performed well in Euro NCAP’s tests with dummy readings indicating good protection for both the driver and passenger.  Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.  A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.  The car has an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and a  system to prevent secondary impacts after the car has been in a collision.  EBRO demonstrated that the doors and windows would be openable to allow occupants to escape in the event of vehicle submergence.

In both the frontal offset and side barrier tests, protection of the 6 year dummy was good for all critical body areas and good or adequate for the 10 year dummy.  The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position.  Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded.  The EBRO s400 is equipped with a direct 'child presence detection' system, which issues a warning when it detects that a child or infant has been left in the car. All of the child restraint types for which the EBRO s400 is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.

Protection of the head of a struck pedestrian or cyclist was largely good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars and at the base of the screen.  Protection of the pelvis was almost completely poor, scoring only a fraction of a point.  Protection of the femur was good at all test locations, while that of the knee and tibia was good or adequate.  The autonomous emergency braking system of the EBRO s400 responds to vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists, as well as to other vehicles.  In tests of its response to pedestrians, the system performed well, including adequate protection for those to the rear of the car.  The system also performed well in tests of its reaction to cyclists, including ‘dooring’, where a door is opened into the path of a cyclist approaching from behind.  The system’s response to motorcyclists was good.

Overall, the performance of the autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system was good in tests of its reaction to other vehicles.  A seatbelt reminder system is fitted as standard to the front and rear seats.  The car has a direct driver status monitoring system as standard, detecting driver fatigue and some types of distraction.  The lane support system gently corrects the vehicle’s path if it is drifting out of lane and also intervenes in some more critical situations.  The speed assistance system identifies the local speed limit.  The driver can choose to allow the limiter to be set automatically by the system.

Tested ModelEBRO s400 HEV, LHD
Body TypeSUV
Kerb Weight1475 kg
Adult Occupant

Adult Occupant

79%
Child Occupant

Child Occupant

85%
Vulnerable Road Users

Vulnerable Road Users

78%
Safety Assist

Safety Assist

80%

Safety Equipment

Driver
Passenger
Rear
Front Airbag
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
NOT_APPLICABLE
Belt Pretensioner
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Belt Loadlimiter
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
FITTED_STANDARD
Knee Airbag
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_AVAILABLE
NOT_APPLICABLE

Note: other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year

  • Fitted to the vehicle as standard
    Fitted to the vehicle as standard
  • Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
    Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack
  • Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
    Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack
  • Not available
    Not available
  • Not applicable
    Not applicable

Rating Validity

Body Type
Variant Description
Drivetrain
Rating Applies LHD
Rating Applies RHD
5 door SUV
1.5 litre HEV - Premium
4x2
true
-
5 door SUV
1.5 litre HEV - Excellence*
4x2
true
-
  • * Tested Variant

Additional Information