- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Find more information in the Rating Validity tab of the assessment
-
See More
![]()
93% -
See More
![]()
84% -
See More
![]()
71% -
See More
![]()
60%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
Driver
Rear Passenger
Driver
Car
Pole
Rear Seat
Front Seat
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Passenger
outboard
center
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option![]()
Not Available
-
i-Size CRS
-
ISOFIX CRS
-
Universal Belted CRS
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
Difficult
Safety critical| Seat Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front | 2nd row | |||
| Passenger | Left | center | Right | |
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X1 i-Size (iSize) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| BeSafe iZi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | |
|
|
|
| Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) | |
|
|
|
![]()
Easy![]()
Difficult![]()
Safety critical![]()
Not allowed
In the frontal offset and side barrier tests, both dummies were properly restrained throughout the impacts. In the frontal test, protection was good or adequate except for the chest of the 6 year dummy, for which dummy measurements of deceleration indicated marginal protection. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good for both the 6 and 10 year children. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. In Euro NCAP's installation tests, all restraints could be properly installed and accommodated by the Ateca.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Head Impact 14.5 Pts
Pelvis Impact 3.8 Pts
Leg Impact 6.0 Pts
| System Name | Front Assist | ||
| Type | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | ||
| Operational From | 10 km/h | ||
| Additional Information | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | ||
| PERFORMANCE | | |||
| Autobrake Function | |||
| Avoidance | Mitigation | ||
|
Running Adult crossing from Farside
|
Collision avoided up to 45 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -25%
|
Collision avoided up to 35 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Walking Adult crossing from Nearside -75%
|
Collision avoided up to 45 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
|
Running Child from behind parked vehicles
|
Collision avoided up to 30 km/h | Impact mitigated up to 60 km/h | |
The bonnet showed predominantly adequate or marginal results for the protection offered to the head of a struck pedestrian. The bumper showed good results at all test locations and scored maximum points for its protection of pedestrians' legs. However, protection of the pelvis area was more mixed with areas of good and poor protection. The autonomous emergency braking system is able to detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and performed well in Euro NCAP's tests of this functionality.
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
| System Name | Speed Assistance System |
| Speed Limit Information Function | N/A |
| Warning Function | Manually set |
| Speed Limitation Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
| Applies To | All seats | ||
| Warning | Driver Seat | Front Passenger(s) | Rear Passenger(s) |
| Visual | |
|
|
| Audible | |
|
|
|
|||
| System Name | Front Assist | |||
| Type | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
| Operational From | 10 km/h | |||
| Additional Information | Default On; Supplementary Warning | |||
| Performance | | ||||
| Autobrake Function Only | Driver reacts to warning | |||
| Operational Speed | 10-210 km/h | 30-210 km/h | ||
| Approaching a stationary car | See AEB City | Crash avoided up to 45km/h.Crash speed reduced up to 75km/h. | ||
| Approaching a slower moving car | Crash avoided up to 70km/h. | Crash avoided up to 80km/h. | ||
| Following a car at short distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Mitigation | Mitigation | ||
| Following a car at long distance | ||||
| Car in front brakes gently | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
| Car in front brakes harshly | Avoidance | Avoidance | ||
Tests of the autonomous emergency braking system at highway speeds demonstrated good performance, the impact in most cases being avoided or mitigated. The Ateca has a standard-fit seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats and also a driver-set speed limiter. A lane assistance system is also available but, as it is an option, it was not included in this assessment.
- Specifications
- Safety Equipment
- Videos
- Rating Validity
Specifications
Tested Model SEAT Ateca 1.6 diesel, LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2016
Kerb Weight 1300kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all Atecas of the specification tested
Class Small Off-Road 4x4
Safety Equipment
Note: Other equipment may be available on the vehicle but was not considered in the test year.
![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as standard![]()
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety pack![]()
Not fitted to the test vehicle but available as option or as part of the safety pack![]()
Not available![]()
Not applicable
Fitted to the vehicle as part of the safety packVideos
Rating Validity
Find more information in the General Comments section of the assessment
Share
The passenger compartment of the Ateca remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and the passenger. SEAT showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good for all critical body areas and was good for the rear passenger except for the chest, protection of which was marginal. In the side barrier test, the side curtain airbag did not deploy as intended and, while dummy readings were good, the score for the head was penalised and protection for this part of the body was rated as adequate. The same penalty was applied in the side pole test, even though the airbag deployed correctly. Protection of the head and the chest was rated as adequate and dummy readings indicated good protection of all other body regions. Tests on the front seats and head restraints showed good protection against whiplash in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats showed that occupants would also be well protected in those positions. The Ateca has an autonomous emergency braking system as standard and tests showed it to be good at avoiding or mitigating low speed accidents where whiplash injuries are often caused.