- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
Protection of both child dummies was good apart from the neck, rated as adequate for the 6 year dummy and marginal for the 10 year dummy. In the side impact test, protection of all critical body areas was good for both dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraint types for which the Polo is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 15.9 分
骨盆碰撞 4.8 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
系统名称 | Front Assist | |||
类型 | Auto-Brake with Forward Collision Warning | |||
运行自 | 4 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Defaults on for every journey; operates above 40km/h and in low ambient light | |||
规避 | 缓解 | |||
成人从远端横穿
|
时速最高 60 公里时避免碰撞 | |||
成人从近端横穿 - 25%
|
时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
成人从近端横穿 - 75%
|
时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 60 公里时缓解碰撞 | ||
儿童从静止车辆后方跑出
|
时速最高 25 公里时避免碰撞 | 时速最高 45 公里时缓解碰撞 |
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was mostly good or adequate, with some poorer results around the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs while protection of the pelvis was more mixed. The autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests of its pedestrian detection, with impacts mostly avoided or mitigated.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
系统名称 | Speed Limiter |
限速信息功能 | N/A |
警告功能 | Manually set |
限速功能 | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Front Assist | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 4 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On; Supplementary Warning | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 4-250 公里/小时 | 4-250 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 40 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 65 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 70 公里时避免碰撞。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 规避 | 缓解 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 缓解 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 规避 |
The Polo has, as standard, a seatbelt reminder system for the front and rear seats, a driver-set speed limiter and an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system. Tests of the AEB system at highway speeds demonstrated good performance with most collisions avoided or mitigated.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 VW Polo 1.0 TSI 'Comfortline', LHD
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1071kg
评级适用的 VIN - all Polos
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
5 door hatchback | 1.0 MPI (48kW and 55kW) | 4x2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.0 TGI | 4x2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.0 TSI* | 4x2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 2.0 TSI | 4x2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.6 TDI (59kW and 70kW) | 4x2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 TSI evo | 4x2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Polo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. VW showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was good or adequate for all critical body regions of both the driver and rear passenger. In both the side barrier test and the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the Polo scored maximum points. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Polo has a standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system. Tests of its performance at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries are caused revealed good performance, with impacts avoided at all test speeds.