- With standard equipment
- With safety pack
在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
在评估表的评级有效性选项卡中可以了解到更多信息
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 了解详情
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差








- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差


乘客
外侧
中间
车辆标配
试验车辆未安装但可选配
未配备
-
i-Size 儿童约束装置
-
ISOFIX 儿童约束装置
-
带通用安全带的儿童约束装置 (CRS)
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
座椅位置 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
前排 | 第 2 排 | |||
乘客 | 左 | 中间 | 右 | |
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (rearward) (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi 2way Pearl & 2wayFix (forward) (iSize) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X2 i-Size (iSize) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & FamilyFix (ISOFIX) | ||||
BeSafe iZi Kid X4 ISOfix (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (ISOFIX) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Belt) | ||||
Maxi Cosi Cabriofix & EasyBase2 (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer King II LS (Belt) | ||||
Britax Römer KidFix XP (Belt) |
顺利安装
小心安装
严重安全问题
不允许安装
In the frontal offset test, protection of both child dummies was good or adequate. In the side barrier test, the curtain airbag did not cover the area needed to provide protection for the head of the 10 year dummy, sat on the struck side. The head contacted the interior trim and recorded deceleration which demonstrated marginal protection for this critical body area. Protection of other critical body areas was good for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. Installation of the rearward-facing Group 0+ universal restraint in the rear centre seating position was not possible owing to insufficient length of webbing to pass around the shell and buckle the belt. Otherwise, restraints could be properly installed and accommodated in the car.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差

头部碰撞 16.7 分
骨盆碰撞 4.0 分
腿部碰撞 6.0 分
The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars. The protection offered to pedestrians' legs was good in all areas tested while that offered to the pelvis was good in some areas and weak in others. The autonomous emergency braking system detects other vehicles but cannot detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians or cyclists.
- 优秀
- 充分
- 边缘
- 弱
- 差
适用于 | All seats | ||
警告 | 驾驶员座椅 | 前排乘客 | 后排乘客 |
视觉 | |||
听觉 | |||
|
系统名称 | Lane departure Alert as part of Toyota Safety Sense |
类型 | Lane Departure Warning |
运行自 | 50 公里/小时 |
警告 | Audible |
性能 | |
LDW 确认试验
|
Pass |
系统名称 | Pre-collision System as part of Toyota Safety Sense | |||
类型 | Forward Collision Warning with Auto-Brake | |||
运行自 | 10 公里/小时 | |||
其他信息 | Default On | |||
性能 | | ||||
仅限自动刹车功能 | 驾驶员的警告反应 | |||
运行速度 | 10-80 公里/小时 | 15-140 公里/小时 | ||
接近静止车辆 | 了解低速自动紧急制动 | 时速最高 60 公里时避免碰撞。时速最高 65 公里时降低碰撞速度。 | ||
接近缓慢行驶车辆 | 时速最高 70 公里时避免碰撞。 | 时速最高 80 公里时避免碰撞。 | ||
近距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 | ||
远距离跟车 | ||||
前车轻踩刹车 | 规避 | 规避 | ||
前车急刹车 | 缓解 | 缓解 |
The Yaris has a seatbelt reminder for the front and rear seats. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking system performed well in tests at highway speeds, with collisions avoided or mitigated in most scenarios. A lane departure warning system is also standard equipment on the Yaris.
- 规格
- 安全设备
- 视频
- 评级有效性
规格
试验车型 Toyota Yaris Hybrid
车身式样 - 5 door hatchback
公布年份 2017
整备质量 1155kg
评级适用的 VIN -
级别 微型车
安全设备
注:车辆上可能会配备其他设备,但在试验年份未予考虑。
车辆标配
作为安全套装的一部分配备于车辆
试验车辆未安装但可选配,或者作为安全套装的一部分配备
不可用
不适用
视频
评级有效性
所有车型车款
Body Type | Engine & Transmission | Drivetrain | Rating Applies | |
---|---|---|---|---|
LHD | RHD | |||
3 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
3 door hatchback | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
3 door hatchback | 1.4 diesel | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.0 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 petrol | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.4 diesel | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
5 door hatchback | 1.5 petrol hybrid* | 4 x 2 | ![]() |
![]() |
* Tested variant


在评估表的一般评语部分可以了解到更多信息
The passenger compartment of the Yaris remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard were thought to present a risk to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions, and protection of this body region was rated as marginal. Protection of the driver's chest was also rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver was good or adequate. However, the pelvis of the rear passenger dummy slipped under the lap section of the seatbelt and protection of the pelvis was rated as poor. In addition, the head moved further forward in the impact than recommended and its protection was rated as marginal even though dummy injury values were not excessive. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the Yaris scored maximum points. However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings indicated marginal protection of the chest and abdomen. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The Yaris has, as standard, an autonomous emergency braking system. In tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, the system demonstrated good performance, with collisions avoided or mitigated at all test speeds.